Loading…

Motor cortical excitability during voluntary inhibition of involuntary tic movements

ABSTRACT Background: Tics can be voluntarily inhibited. However, the neurophysiology of voluntary tic inhibition remains underexplored. The objective of this study was to explore state‐dependent effects of voluntary tic inhibition on M1 excitability. Methods: Neurophysiological assessments (single m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Movement disorders 2018-11, Vol.33 (11), p.1804-1809
Main Authors: Ganos, Christos, Rocchi, Lorenzo, Latorre, Anna, Hockey, Leanne, Palmer, Clare, Joyce, Eileen M., Bhatia, Kailash P., Haggard, Patrick, Rothwell, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Background: Tics can be voluntarily inhibited. However, the neurophysiology of voluntary tic inhibition remains underexplored. The objective of this study was to explore state‐dependent effects of voluntary tic inhibition on M1 excitability. Methods: Neurophysiological assessments (single motor‐evoked potentials, corticospinal recruitment curves, short‐interval intracortical inhibition, H‐reflex) were performed in 14 adults with Tourette syndrome during voluntary tic inhibition and free ticcing. Regressions between behavioral performance and neurophysiological measures were also performed. Results: Voluntary tic inhibition reduced corticospinal excitability: the greater the ability to inhibit tics, the greater was the reduction in excitability. Voluntary tic inhibition was not associated with changes in the excitability of short‐interval intracortical inhibition or the H‐reflex. Conclusions: Voluntary inhibition of tics reduces the excitability of corticospinal output. The pattern of neurophysiological findings is consistent with a withdrawal of excitation, but not with modulation of the inhibitory interneuronal mechanisms involved in short‐interval intracortical inhibition. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.27479