The addiction Stroop task: examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues

• Published in: Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford) 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.510-519
• Main Authors: Cane, JE, Sharma, D, Albery, IP
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Addictions; Addictive behaviors; Adult; Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Anxiety; Attention; Bias; Biological and medical sciences; Cannabis; Cues; Drug dependence; Drug legalization; Female; Humans; Male; Marijuana; Marijuana Abuse - psychology; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Neuropharmacology; Neuropsychological Tests; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Reaction Time - drug effects; Smoking; Smoking - psychology; Time Factors; Tobacco smoking; Tobacco, tobacco smoking; Toxicology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0269-8811; 1461-7285
• DOI: 10.1177/0269881108091253

Abstract Research has shown that attentional bias toward smoking-related stimuli is related to the maintenance of smoking behaviour and the chance of a relapse during a quit attempt. Effects of smoking attentional bias can occur both during smoking stimulus presentation (fast effect) and on stimuli that immediately follow smoking stimuli (slow effect). The current research builds on these findings by closely examining the temporal aspects of these fast and slow effects across groups of different smoking status. In Experiment 1 (n = 64), smokers, smokers attempting to quit (SATQ) and non-smokers completed an addiction Stroop task using smoking related, negative emotion and neutral stimuli. In Experiment 2 (n = 32), marijuana smokers and non-marijuana smokers completed an addiction Stroop task using marijuana and neutral stimuli. Results showed fast effects across all smoking groups (except non-smokers) and slow effects in SATQ and marijuana smokers. Furthermore, marijuana smokers showed slow effects over extended periods of time. Results also show a relationship between anxiety, nicotine dependence and attentional bias in SATQ. The implications of these findings are discussed.