Loading…

Liver decompensation in HIV/Hepatitis B coinfection in the combination antiretroviral therapy era does not seem increased compared to hepatitis B mono‐infection

Background & Aims HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfected subjects are thought to have faster progression to end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) than HBV mono‐infected subjects. We assessed whether this remains in the current cART‐era. Methods Data from subjects with follow‐up completion post‐2003 wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Liver international 2019-03, Vol.39 (3), p.470-483
Main Authors: Lieveld, Faydra I., Smit, Colette, Richter, Clemens, van Erpecum, Karel J., Spanier, Bernhard W. M., Gisolf, Elisabeth H., Vrolijk, Jan M., Siersema, Peter D., Hoepelman, Andy I. M., Reiss, Peter, Arends, Joop E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background & Aims HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfected subjects are thought to have faster progression to end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) than HBV mono‐infected subjects. We assessed whether this remains in the current cART‐era. Methods Data from subjects with follow‐up completion post‐2003 were compared between HIV/HBV coinfected subjects in the Dutch HIV Monitoring database and HBV mono‐infected subjects from two centres. The primary outcomes of composite ESLD included portal hypertension, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation and liver‐related mortality. Outcomes were analysed using time‐dependent cause‐specific Cox regression models adjusted for follow‐up time and relevant covariates. Subset‐analyses were done in subjects with follow‐up pre‐2003. Results In the 1336 co‐ vs 742 mono‐infected subjects, coinfected subjects had no increased probability for ESLD compared to mono‐infected subjects (cHR 0.7 (95% CI 0.4‐1.1), but had increased probabilities for all‐cause (cHR 7.4 [4.9‐11.1]) and liver‐related mortality (cHR 3.4 [1.6‐7.5]). In the current combined cohort, treatment with tenofovir or entecavir was inversely associated with ESLD, all‐cause and liver‐related mortality (cHR 0.4 [95% CI 0.3‐0.7], cHR 0.003 [0.001‐0.01]), cHR 0.007 [0.001‐0.05]). Other predictors for ESLD were older age, being of Sub‐Sahara African descent, increased alanine aminotransferase levels and hepatitis C virus coinfection. While the probability for all‐cause mortality was increased in coinfected subjects, this rate decreased compared to pre‐2003 (HR 40.2 (95% CI: 8.7‐186.2). Conclusions HIV/HBV coinfected patients no longer seem to be at increased risk for progression to ESLD compared to HBV mono‐infected patients, likely due to widespread use of highly effective cART with dual HBV and HIV activity.
ISSN:1478-3223
1478-3231
DOI:10.1111/liv.14000