Loading…

The value of immediate postoperative intravesical epirubicin instillation as an adjunct to standard adjuvant treatment in intermediate and high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A preliminary results of randomized controlled trial

•Immediate intravesical instillation did not show superior effect in our study.•It neither reduced recurrence/progression rate nor reduced number of recurrences.•Immediate instillation should only be spared for low risk patients. We aimed at this study to test the value of immediate postoperative in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologic oncology 2019-03, Vol.37 (3), p.179.e9-179.e18
Main Authors: Elsawy, Amr A., El-Assmy, Ahmed M., Bazeed, Mahmoud A., Ali-El-Dein, Bedeir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Immediate intravesical instillation did not show superior effect in our study.•It neither reduced recurrence/progression rate nor reduced number of recurrences.•Immediate instillation should only be spared for low risk patients. We aimed at this study to test the value of immediate postoperative intravesical epirubicin instillation in intermediate and high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. After approval of Institutional Review Board, 260 patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, including transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) alone in control group and TURBT plus immediate postoperative epirubicin (50 mg) in test group. Patients were monitored for postoperative complications. Adjuvant instillation therapy was administered according to risk categorization. Patients were followed every 3 months by cystourethroscopy and urine cytology. The primary end points were recurrence, progression, and/or death from cancer. Of the 260 patients, 236 were eligible and followed for a mean of 29 months. The 2 study groups were comparable regarding perioperative baseline demographic criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding recurrence rate (27.1% vs. 26.2%), interval to first recurrence (16.3 ± 6.6 vs. 16.4 ± 6.4 months) or progression rate to muscle invasion (8.5% vs. 5.9%). Site, size, and number of recurrences were also comparable between the 2 groups. Recurrences and progression-free survival were comparable between the 2 groups (Log-rank P = 0.88 and 0.47, respectively). Postoperative complications were all low-grade according to modified Dindo–Clavian system, with no significant difference in their rate between the 2 groups. Immediate post-TURBT epirubicin instillation is ineffective in intermediate and high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. It neither prolongs time to recurrence and/or progression nor reduces number of recurrences. We advocate strict specification of patient and tumor criteria in which immediate instillation is indicated.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.019