Influence of Bulking Agents, Fertilizers and Bacteria on the Removal of Diesel from a Newfoundland Soil

• Published in: Soil & sediment contamination 2009-05, Vol.18 (3), p.383-396
• Main Authors: Coles, Cynthia A., Patel, Thakor R., Akinnola, Ayobamidele P., Helleur, Robert J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerobic biodegradation; Bacteria; Bioremediation; cold-tolerant bacteria; cow manure; Diesel fuels; Experiments; Fertilizers; poultry manure; sand; Soil sciences; total petroleum hydrocarbons
• ISSN: 1532-0383; 1549-7887
• DOI: 10.1080/15320380902772687

Laboratory experiments in culture flasks, containing diesel-contaminated Newfoundland soil samples, were undertaken to compare the influence of fertilizers, microorganisms and bulking agents on bioremediation. In Phase I experiments only one fertilizer (cow manure or poultry manure), one bulking agent (sand or hay), or one inoculum (cold-tolerant indigenous bacteria or exogenous commercial bacteria) was added to a soil sample. In Phase II experiments, Design-Expert® Version 6 design of experiment software determined the combinations of fertilizers, bulking agents and inocula to be mixed with the soil samples to study the interactions among the amendments. The maximum diesel removal at 90 days occurred in the sample with sand (Phase I) and in the sample with cow manure, an inoculum of cold-tolerant indigenous bacteria, and sand (Phase II). Diesel removal at 45 days for the same two samples was 85.4% (Phase I) and 91.9% (Phase II), suggesting the cow manure and/or cold-tolerant bacteria inoclum accelerated the process. The poultry manure, commercial bacteria and hay were less effective than their counterparts. The commercial bacteria were more sensitive to diesel concentration than the indigenous cold-tolerant bacteria. The addition of sand, cow manure, and poultry manure improved diesel removal.