Cadenced runs of impulse and hybrid control systems

Impulse differential inclusions, and in particular, hybrid control systems, are defined by a differential inclusion (or a control system) and a reset map. A run of an impulse differential inclusion is defined by a sequence of cadences, of reinitialized states and of motives describing the evolution...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of robust and nonlinear control 2001-04, Vol.11 (5), p.401-415
Main Authors: Aubin, Jean-Pierre, Haddad, Georges
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
cadenced run
contingent cone
Differential equations
differential inclusion
equilibrium
execution
hybrid control
impulse control
Kakutani theorem
Marchaud map
Neurology
periodic
run
Set theory
Theorem proving
Vectors
viability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Impulse differential inclusions, and in particular, hybrid control systems, are defined by a differential inclusion (or a control system) and a reset map. A run of an impulse differential inclusion is defined by a sequence of cadences, of reinitialized states and of motives describing the evolution along a given cadence between two distinct consecutive impulse times, the value of a motive at the end of a cadence being reset as the next reinitialized state of the next cadence. A cadenced run is then defined by constant cadence, initial state and motive, where the value at the end of the cadence is reset at the same reinitialized state. It plays the role of a ‘discontinuous’ periodic solution of a differential inclusion. We prove that if the sequence of reinitialized states of a run converges to some state, then the run converges to a cadenced run starting from this state, and that, under convexity assumptions, that a cadenced run does exist. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1049-8923
1099-1239
DOI:10.1002/rnc.590