Loading…
Cadenced runs of impulse and hybrid control systems
Impulse differential inclusions, and in particular, hybrid control systems, are defined by a differential inclusion (or a control system) and a reset map. A run of an impulse differential inclusion is defined by a sequence of cadences, of reinitialized states and of motives describing the evolution...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of robust and nonlinear control 2001-04, Vol.11 (5), p.401-415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Impulse differential inclusions, and in particular, hybrid control systems, are defined by a differential inclusion (or a control system) and a reset map. A run of an impulse differential inclusion is defined by a sequence of cadences, of reinitialized states and of motives describing the evolution along a given cadence between two distinct consecutive impulse times, the value of a motive at the end of a cadence being reset as the next reinitialized state of the next cadence.
A cadenced run is then defined by constant cadence, initial state and motive, where the value at the end of the cadence is reset at the same reinitialized state. It plays the role of a ‘discontinuous’ periodic solution of a differential inclusion.
We prove that if the sequence of reinitialized states of a run converges to some state, then the run converges to a cadenced run starting from this state, and that, under convexity assumptions, that a cadenced run does exist. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1049-8923 1099-1239 |
DOI: | 10.1002/rnc.590 |