Older adults exhibit variable responses in stepping behaviour following unexpected forward perturbations during gait initiation

• Published in: Human movement science 2019-02, Vol.63, p.120-128
• Main Authors: Shulman, David, Spencer, Abbigale, Ann Vallis, Lori
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Gait initiation; Older adults; Perturbations; Posture; Reactive control
• ISSN: 0167-9457; 1872-7646
• DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.11.008

•Randomized forward/backward perturbations were delivered during gait initiation.•During unperturbed gait initiation older adults took slower shorter steps.•Older adults took both forward/backwards steps following a forward perturbation.•Strategies observed in older adults may present with increased falls risk. With the socioeconomic burden associated with falls expected to rise as the average age of the Canadian population increases, research is needed to elucidate the nature of postural responses generated by older adults (OA) following a posture-destabilizing event. This knowledge is even more imperative for novel and difficult tasks, such as gait initiation (GI), a task known to pose a postural threat to stability for OA. A common technique to regain stability following an unexpected perturbation is reactive stepping. A deficiency in the execution of a reactive control strategy following a destabilizing event may be the cause of many unexpected falls in OA. The purpose of this study is to explore age related changes in the nature of these responses during a challenging GI task combined with an unexpected forward perturbation of the support surface. A total of 18 young adults (YA) and 16 OA performed 36 trials containing 20 unexpected perturbations. We calculated step width, length, time and COM velocity in the first unperturbed step and the second perturbed step. Results revealed that, during unperturbed GI, OA had a reduced forward velocity and took shorter, faster steps. Following forward perturbations, OA altered stepping patterns, perhaps to reduce single support duration, via reduced base of support and shorter step length compared to YA. Additionally, OA executed both forward and backwards directed steps however YA only generated forward steps. Regression analyses revealed that reduced forward velocity was predictive of step direction; which is possibly an unfavorable motor control strategy as OA who walk slower generated a posterior directed step immediately following the perturbation. This strategy is of concern as rapid responses by the trail limb are required to recover successfully, and these alterations may be associated with an elevated risk of falls.