Space for intuition – the ‘Surprise’-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists

• Published in: Palliative medicine 2019-05, Vol.33 (5), p.531-540
• Main Authors: Gerlach, Christina, Goebel, Swantje, Weber, Sascha, Weber, Martin, Sleeman, Katherine E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Blood cancer; Bone marrow; Cancer; Communication skills; Critical thinking; Decision Making; Female; Germany; Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy; Hematology; Holistic approach; Hospice care; Hospitals, University; Humans; Integrated care; Interviews as Topic; Intuition; Male; Meaning; Medical prognosis; Middle Aged; Oncologists; Oncologists - psychology; Oncology; Outpatient care facilities; Outpatients; Palliative Care; Patient-centered care; Patients; Perceptions; Prognosis; Qualitative Research; Referral and Consultation; Uncertainty; Willingness
• ISSN: 0269-2163; 1477-030X
• DOI: 10.1177/0269216318824271

Background: Early integration of palliative care can improve outcomes for people with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses. However, prediction of survival for individuals is challenging, in particular in patients with haematological malignancies who are known to have limited access to palliative care. The ‘Surprise’-Question can be used to facilitate referral to palliative care. Aim: To explore experiences, views and perceptions of haemato-oncologists on the use of the ‘Surprise’-Question in the haemato-oncology outpatients clinics of a university hospital in Germany. Design: A qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically based on the framework approach. Setting/participants: The study took place at the haemato-oncology outpatient clinic and the bone marrow transplantation outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Nine haemato-oncologists participated in qualitative interviews. Results: Thematic analysis identified 4 themes and 11 subthemes: (1) meaning and relevance of the ‘Surprise’-Question; (2) feasibility; (3) the concept of ‘surprise’ and (4) personal aspects of prognostication. A key function of the ‘Surprise’-Question was to stimulate intuition and promote patient-centred goals of care by initiating a process of pause → reflection → change of perspective. It was easy and quick to use, but required time and communication skills to act on. Participants’ training in palliative care enhanced their willingness to use the ‘Surprise’-Question. Conclusion: Irrespective of its use in prognostication, the ‘Surprise’-Question is a valuable tool to facilitate consideration of patient-centred goals and promote holistic care in haemato-oncology. However, prognostic uncertainty, lack of time and communication skills are barriers for integration into daily practice. Further research should involve haematology patients to integrate their needs and preferences.