The experience among patients with multiple dental loss as a consequence of treatment for head and neck cancer: A qualitative study

• Published in: Journal of dentistry 2019-03, Vol.82, p.30-37
• Main Authors: Parahoo, Roisin S., Semple, Cheirth J., Killough, Simon, McCaughan, Eilís
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cancer; Cancer therapies; Chemotherapy; Clinical decision making; Data collection; Decision making; Dental loss; Dental materials; Dental prosthetics; Dentistry; Dentists; Dentures; Female; Head & neck cancer; Head and neck cancer; Head and Neck Neoplasms - psychology; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery; Humans; Interviews; Interviews as Topic; Male; Medical research; Middle Aged; Northern Ireland; Patient experience; Patients; Pretreatment; Prostheses; Qualitative Research; Quality of Life; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy - adverse effects; Rehabilitation; Researchers; Shared decision-making; Studies; Surgery; Surgical implants; Teeth; Tooth Extraction - psychology; Tooth Extraction - statistics & numerical data; Tooth Loss - etiology; Tooth Loss - psychology; Tumors
• ISSN: 0300-5712; 1879-176X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.010

To explore the experience among patients with multiple dental loss as a consequence of treatment for head and neck cancer. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of fifteen people with head and neck cancer, who had multiple teeth removed as part of their tumour resection or extracted pre-radiotherapy. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed for analysis by two researchers, independently. The interview data were categorised into four themes: 1. Pretreatment experience of being informed that teeth had to be removed, 2. Impact of dental loss post-treatment, 3. Coping with dental loss, and 4. Getting dentures and implants. Patients receiving primary radiotherapy felt the time between being informed of requirement for dental extractions and actual extractions was short. Dental loss was detrimental to all patients in terms of eating, speaking, socially and their intimate lives. Patients whose primary treatment was surgery, appeared more accepting of dental loss. Whereas, those having primary radiotherapy, there seemed to be a focus on prevention of radiotherapy-induced complications, with limited choices and recognition on post-treatment dental functionality. This study showed the negative impact of dental loss on patients' quality of life. Dentists should be aware of the post-treatment implications of dental loss on patients' lives; presenting this, as well as the clinical advantages for extractions, to aid decision-making. Patients should be informed of the lack of conclusive research evidence regarding pre-radiotherapy dental extraction. There should also be clear pathways regarding post-treatment dental-related rehabilitation.