A combination of naso- and oropharyngeal swabs improves the diagnostic yield of respiratory viruses in adult emergency department patients

Background: Along with the current development of molecular diagnostic methods of respiratory viruses, the bedside patient sampling techniques need to be evaluated. We here asked the question whether the addition of an oropharynx swab to the traditional nasopharynx swab might improve the diagnostic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Infectious diseases (London, England) England), 2019-04, Vol.51 (4), p.241-248
Main Authors: Ek, Peter, Böttiger, Blenda, Dahlman, Disa, Hansen, Karin B., Nyman, Mattias, Nilsson, Anna C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Medicine
Infectious Medicine
Infektionsmedicin
Influenza
Klinisk medicin
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
nasopharynx
oropharynx
PCR
viral diagnostics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Along with the current development of molecular diagnostic methods of respiratory viruses, the bedside patient sampling techniques need to be evaluated. We here asked the question whether the addition of an oropharynx swab to the traditional nasopharynx swab might improve the diagnostic yield of multiplex PCR analysis. Ct values from the two sampling sites were compared as well as patient tolerability. Methods: In an emergency department in Malmö, Sweden, 98 adult patients with respiratory disease were sampled both from the nasopharynx and oropharynx for virus diagnostics by PCR. Results: Influenza (AH1, AH3, B), human metapneumovirus (hMPV) or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were detected by PCR in 58 subjects. The diagnostic yield was improved by combining nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal sampling - a virus was detected in another 6 patients compared to traditional nasopharyngeal sampling (p = .031, McNemar's test). In 38/55 subjects viral load was higher in the nasopharynx than in the oropharynx. Self-reported discomfort was significantly lower from oropharyngeal sampling than from nasopharyngeal sampling. Conclusions: Adding an oropharynx sample to a nasopharynx sample increased the diagnostic yield of respiratory viruses. Oropharyngeal sampling was well tolerated.
ISSN:2374-4235
2374-4243
DOI:10.1080/23744235.2018.1546055