Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation

• Published in: Heart and vessels 2019-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1710-1716
• Main Authors: Chikata, Akio, Kato, Takeshi, Usuda, Kazuo, Fujita, Shuhei, Maruyama, Michiro, Otowa, Kan-ichi, Takashima, Shin-ichiro, Murai, Hisayoshi, Usui, Soichiro, Furusho, Hiroshi, Kaneko, Shuichi, Takamura, Masayuki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ablation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Body mass; Body mass index; Body size; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods; Cardiac Surgery; Cardiology; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects; Catheters; Complications; Coronary Sinus - surgery; Electrodes; Feasibility; Feasibility studies; Female; Fistulae; Hemorrhage; Humans; Insertion; Japan; Male; Medical instruments; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Neuropathy; Original Article; Paralysis; Perforation; Peripheral Nerve Injuries - etiology; Peripheral Nerve Injuries - prevention & control; Phrenic nerve; Phrenic Nerve - injuries; Placement; Pseudoaneurysm; Pulmonary Veins - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Stimulation; Ultrasound; Vascular Surgery; Veins & arteries; Vena Cava, Superior - surgery
• ISSN: 0910-8327; 1615-2573
• DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01402-4

Phrenic nerve (PN) stimulation is essential for the elimination of PN palsy during balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although ultrasound-guided vascular access is safe, insertion of a PN stimulation catheter via central venous access carries a potential risk of the development of mechanical complications. We evaluated the safety of a left cubital vein approach for positioning a 20-electrode atrial cardioversion (BeeAT) catheter in the coronary sinus (CS), and the feasibility of right PN pacing from the superior vena cava (SVC) using proximal electrodes of the BeeAT catheter. In total, 106 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-based PVI with a left cubital vein approach for BeeAT catheter positioning were retrospectively assessed. The left cubital approach was successful in 105 patients (99.1%), and catheter insertion into the CS was possible for 104 patients (99.0%). Among these patients, constant right PN pacing from the SVC was obtained for 89 patients (89/104, 85.6%). In five patients, transient loss of right PN capture occurred during right pulmonary vein ablation. No persistent right PN palsy was observed. Small subcutaneous hemorrhage was observed in eight patients (7.5%). Neuropathy, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and perforations associated with the left cubital approach were not detected. Body mass index was significantly higher in the right PN pacing failure group than in the right PN pacing success group (26.2 ± 3.2 vs. 23.8 ± 3.8; P  = 0.025). CS catheter placement with a left cubital vein approach for right PN stimulation was found to be safe and feasible. Right PN pacing from the SVC using a BeeAT catheter was successfully achieved in the majority of the patients. This approach may prove to be preferable for non-obese patients.