Loading…

Imaging calcinosis in patients with systemic sclerosis by radiography, computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Objective outcome measures are needed to facilitate clinical trials of much needed treatments for calcinosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Our primary aim was to compare radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure calcinotic lesions. Secondary objectives incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 2019-10, Vol.49 (2), p.279-282
Main Authors: Hughes, Michael, Hodgson, Richard, Harris, Jonathan, Porter, Neil, Jackson, Sarah, Kirwadi, Anand, Manning, Joanne, Peytrignet, Sébastien, Herrick, Ariane L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective outcome measures are needed to facilitate clinical trials of much needed treatments for calcinosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Our primary aim was to compare radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure calcinotic lesions. Secondary objectives included to examine reproducibility of radiography and MRI, and inter-rater reliability of MRI. 15 patients with SSc and clinically apparent calcinosis were studied. On one hand, radiography, CT and MRI were performed. The number (all techniques), area (radiography) and volume (CT and MRI) of calcinotic areas were extracted by ‘blinded’ musculoskeletal radiologists. No significant difference (P = 0.289) in the mean (SD) number of lesions (per hand) was seen between radiography: 5.4 (4.6), CT: 6.3 (6.5) and MRI: 5.2 (3.9). Mean (SD) lesion volumes were systematically higher as measured by CT: 656.7 (1939.9) mm3 compared to MRI: 442 (1083.2) mm3. Radiographic area was highly correlated (P = 
ISSN:0049-0172
1532-866X
DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.03.001