Loading…

Predictors of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and survival in chemoradiation treated head and neck cancer patients

•Weekly cisplatin dosing reduces cisplatin induced ototoxicity.•MATE1 A/A subjects are at reduced ototoxicity risk.•COMT carriers are at increased risk of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.•Treatment efficacy was not affected by weekly cisplatin dosing or MATE1/COMT status. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral oncology 2019-02, Vol.89, p.72-78
Main Authors: Teft, Wendy A., Winquist, Eric, Nichols, Anthony C., Kuruvilla, Sara, Richter, Suzanne, Parker, Christina, Francis, Peggy, Trinnear, Maureen, Lukovic, Jelena, Bukhari, Nedal, Choi, Yun-Hee, Welch, Stephen, Palma, David A., Yoo, John, Kim, Richard B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Weekly cisplatin dosing reduces cisplatin induced ototoxicity.•MATE1 A/A subjects are at reduced ototoxicity risk.•COMT carriers are at increased risk of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.•Treatment efficacy was not affected by weekly cisplatin dosing or MATE1/COMT status. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is a common permanent consequence of curative chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Predictors of ototoxicity in HNSCC were examined. In this prospective, observational cohort study, 206 adult HNSCC patients underwent audiometric testing at baseline, during and after treatment with cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Ototoxicity was defined as ≥grade 2 audiometric change from baseline (CTCAE v4.02). Relationships between clinical and pharmacogenetic (TPMT, COMT, ACYP2, CTR1, OCT2, MATE1, ABCC2, ABCC3, and ABCG2) covariates and ototoxicity, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Cox regression. Weekly cisplatin resulted in lower ototoxicity risk while PFS and OS were similar compared to high dose cisplatin (P = 0.00035; HR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07–0.46). COMT (rs9332377) carriers had higher ototoxicity risk (P = 0.00556; HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.17–2.52) while MATE1 (rs2289669) A/A carriers were protected from ototoxicity (P = 0.01062; HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26–0.84). Absence of the protective MATE1 allele among those who carry the risk allele in COMT predicted increased ototoxicity risk, (P = 0.00414; HR = 3.22; 95% CI, 1.45–7.17 and P = 0.00022; HR = 4.89; 95% CI, 2.11–11.36). Survival outcomes did not differ between carriers of protective or risk alleles. Weekly cisplatin dosing, COMT and MATE1 are predictors of ototoxicity without affecting treatment efficacy. COMT and MATE1 genotyping and weekly dosing may be a potential strategy for mitigating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in HNSCC.
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.12.010