Loading…

Sitagliptin’s effects on bone tissue and osseointegration in diabetic rats

•Type I diabetes has a deleterious effect on bone microarchitecture.•Type I diabetes has a deleterious effect on implant osseointegration.•Sitagliptin had no direct action on bone osseointegration or on bone remodeling. Objective: To investigate the effects of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of oral biology 2019-06, Vol.102, p.238-243
Main Authors: Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez, Santos, Ingrid Valadares dos, Moraes, Renata Mendonça, Chiba, Fernando Yamamoto, Sumida, Doris Hissako, Moraes, Michele Bianchi de, Vasconcellos, Luana Marotta Reis de, Anbinder, Ana Lia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Type I diabetes has a deleterious effect on bone microarchitecture.•Type I diabetes has a deleterious effect on implant osseointegration.•Sitagliptin had no direct action on bone osseointegration or on bone remodeling. Objective: To investigate the effects of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor used to treat type II diabetes, on bone tissue and on implant osseointegration in diabetic rats. Design: Thirty-two male rats were divided into four groups: 1) Diabetic animals (GD); 2) Diabetic animals that received sitagliptin (GDS); 3) Normoglycemic animals (GN); and 4) Normoglycemic animals that received sitagliptin (GNS). All animals received titanium implants in the right tibia. Sitagliptin or water were administered for 4 weeks. Glycemia, HOMA-IR, insulinemia, microtomographic parameters of the left tibia and implant bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) of the right tibia were evaluated. Results: The model used to induce diabetes led to hyperglycemia. However, HOMA-IR results showed no insulin resistance, and insulinemia was lower in diabetic animals, demonstrating the development of type I diabetes. Sitagliptin administration did not influence glycemic control. The diabetic animals showed a lower BAFO and bone volume fraction, as well as a lower trabecular number and thickness, revealing the deleterious effect of diabetes on bone metabolism and osseointegration. Conclusion: In this model, sitagliptin administration did not reverse the negative effects of type I diabetes on bone, suggesting that sitagliptin has no direct action on bone tissue and has no protective bone action in decompensated diabetic animals.
ISSN:0003-9969
1879-1506
DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.04.018