Loading…
Clinical scribes and their association with patient experience in the otolaryngology clinic
Objectives/Hypothesis Electronic health records have brought many advantages but also placed a documentation burden on the provider during and after the clinic visit. Some otolaryngologists have countered this challenge by employing clinical scribes. This project aimed to better understand the influ...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Laryngoscope 2020-04, Vol.130 (4), p.E134-E139 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives/Hypothesis
Electronic health records have brought many advantages but also placed a documentation burden on the provider during and after the clinic visit. Some otolaryngologists have countered this challenge by employing clinical scribes. This project aimed to better understand the influence of scribes on patient experience in the otolaryngology clinic.
Study Design
Retrospective cohort survey study.
Methods
Patients presenting to the otolaryngology clinic for new and follow‐up appointments were recruited to complete surveys about their experience.
Results
A total of 153 patients completed the survey, and 96 of those patients (62.7%) interacted with a scribe. Patient satisfaction was not significantly associated with participation of the scribe (P = .668). Similarly, patient rating of their physician on a scale of 1 to 10 was not associated with scribe involvement (P = .851). The patients who did interact with a scribe responded that the scribe positively impacted the visit 77.1% of the time. Participation of a resident, primary language other than English, and use of interpreter were associated with lower satisfaction (P = .004, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lary.28075 |