Impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system and additional promotional activities on hand hygiene performance rates and healthcare-associated infections

• Published in: Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2019-07, Vol.40 (7), p.741-747
• Main Authors: Boyce, John M, Laughman, Jennifer A, Ader, Michael H, Wagner, Pamela T, Parker, Albert E, Arbogast, James W
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automation; Clostridium difficile; Clostridium Infections - epidemiology; Clostridium Infections - prevention & control; Cross Infection - epidemiology; Cross Infection - prevention & control; Electronics; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data; Hand Hygiene - standards; Health care; Hospital Units; Hospitals; Humans; Hygiene; Leadership; Monitoring systems; Nosocomial infections; Nursing; Patient safety; Personal hygiene; Personnel, Hospital; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcus infections; Surveillance
• ISSN: 0899-823X; 1559-6834
• DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.77

Determine the impact of an automated hand hygiene monitoring system (AHHMS) plus complementary strategies on hand hygiene performance rates and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Retrospective, nonrandomized, observational, quasi-experimental study. Single, 93-bed nonprofit hospital. Hand hygiene compliance rates were estimated using direct observations. An AHHMS, installed on 4 nursing units in a sequential manner, determined hand hygiene performance rates, expressed as the number of hand hygiene events performed upon entering and exiting patient rooms divided by the number of room entries and exits. Additional strategies implemented to improve hand hygiene included goal setting, hospital leadership support, feeding AHHMS data back to healthcare personnel, and use of Toyota Kata performance improvement methods. HAIs were defined using National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. Hand hygiene compliance rates generated by direct observation were substantially higher than performance rates generated by the AHHMS. Installation of the AHHMS without supplementary activities did not yield sustained improvement in hand hygiene performance rates. Implementing several supplementary strategies resulted in a statistically significant 85% increase in hand hygiene performance rates (P < .0001). The incidence density of non-Clostridioies difficile HAIs decreased by 56% (P = .0841), while C. difficile infections increased by 60% (P = .0533) driven by 2 of the 4 study units. Implementation of an AHHMS, when combined with several supplementary strategies as part of a multimodal program, resulted in significantly improved hand hygiene performance rates. Reductions in non-C. difficile HAIs occurred but were not statistically significant.