Loading…

A 24‐week, randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled clinical trial comparing bexagliflozin with sitagliptin as an adjunct to metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults

Aim To compare the relative safety and effectiveness of bexagliflozin and sitagliptin as adjuncts to metformin for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods Participants (n = 386) were randomized to receive bexagliflozin (20 mg) or sitagliptin (100 mg) in addition to their existing doses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2019-10, Vol.21 (10), p.2248-2256
Main Authors: Halvorsen, Yuan‐Di, Lock, John P., Zhou, Wenjiong, Zhu, Fang, Freeman, Mason W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To compare the relative safety and effectiveness of bexagliflozin and sitagliptin as adjuncts to metformin for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods Participants (n = 386) were randomized to receive bexagliflozin (20 mg) or sitagliptin (100 mg) in addition to their existing doses of metformin. The primary endpoint was the non‐inferiority of bexagliflozin to sitagliptin for change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Changes from baseline to week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass (in subjects with baseline body mass index ≥25 kg m−2) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were secondary endpoints. Results The mean change from baseline to week 24 in HbA1c was −0.74 (95% CI −0.86%, −0.62%) in the bexagliflozin arm and −0.82% (95% CI −0.93%, −0.71%) in the sitagliptin arm, establishing non‐inferiority. The changes from baseline FPG, body mass and SBP were −1.82 mmol L−1, −3.35 kg and −4.23 mmHg in the bexagliflozin arm and −1.45 mmol L−1, −0.81 kg and −1.90 mmHg in the sitagliptin arm, respectively. These differences were significant for the first two measures (one‐sided P = 0.0123, P
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13801