Loading…

Understanding financial toxicity in head and neck cancer survivors

•A considerable proportion of insured head and neck cancer patients demonstrate FT.•Financial toxicity (FT) differs by marital status, education level, and primary site.•Patients with larynx/hypopharynx primary tumors demonstrated the worst FT.•Most survivors use savings and/or loans to cope with ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral oncology 2019-08, Vol.95, p.187-193
Main Authors: Mady, Leila J., Lyu, Lingyun, Owoc, Maryanna S., Peddada, Shyamal D., Thomas, Teresa H., Sabik, Lindsay M., Johnson, Jonas T., Nilsen, Marci L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A considerable proportion of insured head and neck cancer patients demonstrate FT.•Financial toxicity (FT) differs by marital status, education level, and primary site.•Patients with larynx/hypopharynx primary tumors demonstrated the worst FT.•Most survivors use savings and/or loans to cope with out-of-pocket expenses.•This study illuminates that site-specific factors may contribute to increased risk. (1) Describe financial toxicity (FT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and assess its association with personal/health characteristics and health-related quality of life (HRQOL); (2) examine financial coping mechanisms (savings/loans); (3) assess relationship between COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and Financial Distress Questionnaire (FDQ). Cross-sectional survey from January – April 2018 of insured patients at a tertiary multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic who completed primary treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx/hypopharynx. Of 104 survivors, 30 (40.5%) demonstrated high FT. Patients with worse FT were more likely (1) not married (COST, 25.33 ± 1.87 vs. 30.61 ± 1.34, p = 0.008); (2) of lower education levels (COST, 26.12 ± 1.47 vs. 34.14 ± 1.47, p 
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.023