Loading…
Overlooked Role of Sulfur-Centered Radicals During Bromate Reduction by Sulfite
In this work, the kinetics and mechanisms of the reductive removal of BrO3 – by sulfite in air atmosphere were determined. BrO3 – could be effectively reduced by sulfite at pHini 3.0–6.0, and the reduction rate of BrO3 – increased with decreasing pH. The coexisting organic contaminants with electron...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental science & technology 2019-09, Vol.53 (17), p.10320-10328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this work, the kinetics and mechanisms of the reductive removal of BrO3 – by sulfite in air atmosphere were determined. BrO3 – could be effectively reduced by sulfite at pHini 3.0–6.0, and the reduction rate of BrO3 – increased with decreasing pH. The coexisting organic contaminants with electron-rich moieties could be degraded, accompanied with BrO3 – reduction by sulfite. The reaction stoichiometries of −Δ[sulfite]/Δ[bromate] were determined to be 3.33 and 15.63 in the absence and presence of O2, respectively. Many lines of evidence verified that the main reactions in the BrO3 –/sulfite system in air atmosphere included the reduction of BrO3 – to HOBr and its further reduction to Br–, as well as the oxidation of H2SO3 by BrO3 – to form SO3 · – and its further transformation to SO4 · –. Moreover, SO4 · – rather than HOBr was determined to be the major active oxidant in the BrO3 –/sulfite system. SO3 · – played a key role in the over-stoichiometric sulfite consumption because of its rapid reaction with dissolved oxygen. However, the formed SO3 · – was further oxidized by BrO3 – in the N2 atmosphere. BrO3 – reduction by sulfite is an alternative for controlling BrO3 – in water treatment because it was effective in real water at pHini ≤ 6.0. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.est.9b01783 |