Loading…

Machine learning based risk prediction model for asymptomatic individuals who underwent coronary artery calcium score: Comparison with traditional risk prediction approaches

Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm used to identify patterns for prediction in various tasks, and ML methods have been beneficial for developing prediction models when applied to heterogeneous and large datasets. We aim to examine the prognostic ability of a ML-based prediction algorithm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2020-03, Vol.14 (2), p.168-176
Main Authors: Han, Donghee, Kolli, Kranthi K., Gransar, Heidi, Lee, Ji Hyun, Choi, Su-Yeon, Chun, Eun Ju, Han, Hae-Won, Park, Sung Hak, Sung, Jidong, Jung, Hae Ok, Min, James K., Chang, Hyuk-Jae
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm used to identify patterns for prediction in various tasks, and ML methods have been beneficial for developing prediction models when applied to heterogeneous and large datasets. We aim to examine the prognostic ability of a ML-based prediction algorithm utilizing routine health checkup data to predict all-cause mortality (ACM) compared to established risk prediction approaches. A total 86155 patients with seventy available parameters (35 clinical, 32 laboratory, and 3 coronary artery calcium score [CACS] parameters) were analyzed. ML involved feature selection, splitting data randomly into a training (70%) and test set (30%), and model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm. The developed ML model was validated in a separate cohort of 4915 patients. The performance of ML for predicting ACM was compared with the following models: (i) the Framingham risk score (FRS) + CACS, (ii) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) + CACS, with (iii) logistic regression (LR) model. In the derivation dataset, 690 patients died during the median 4.6-year follow-up (interquartile range, 3.0–6.6 years). The AUC value in the ML model was significantly higher than the other models in test set (ML: 0.82, FRS + CACS: 0.70, ASCVD + CACS: 0.74; LR model: 0.79, p 
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.005