Desensitization of NMDA channels requires ligand binding to both GluN1 and GluN2 subunits to constrict the pore beside the activation gate

• Published in: Journal of neurochemistry 2020-06, Vol.153 (5), p.549-566
• Main Authors: Chen, Yu‐Shian, Tu, Ya‐Chi, Lai, Yi‐Chen, Liu, Erin, Yang, Ya‐Chin, Kuo, Chung‐Chin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Binding sites; Channels; Deactivation; Dependence; Desensitization; external pore mouth; Gametocytes; gating mechanism; glutamate; Glutamic acid receptors (ionotropic); Glycine; glycine-dependent desensitization; Ions; Ligands; N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors; Nitrogen; Oocytes; Receptor channels; Receptors; tetraalkylammonium ions; Tetraethylammonium; Vestibules
• ISSN: 0022-3042; 1471-4159
• DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14939

N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor channels are activated by glutamate (or NMDA) and glycine. The channels also undergo desensitization, which denotes decreased channel availability, after prolonged exposure to the activating ligands. Glycine apparently has a paradoxical negative effect on desensitization, as the increase in ambient glycine in concentrations required for channel activation would increase sustained NMDA receptor currents. We hypothesized that this classical “glycine‐dependent desensitization” could be glycine‐dependent activation in essence. By performing electrophysiological recordings and biophysical analyses with rat brain NMDA receptors heterogeneously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we characterized that the channel opened by “only” NMDA (in nominally glycine‐free condition probably with the inevitable nanomolar glycine) would undergo a novel form of deactivation rather than desensitization, and is thus fully available for subsequent activation. Moreover, external tetrapentylammonium ions (TPentA), tetrabutylammonium ions, and tetrapropylammonium ions (TPA, in higher concentrations) block the pore and prohibit channel desensitization with a simple “foot‐in‐the‐door” hindrance effect. TpentA and TPA have the same voltage dependence but show different flow dependence in binding affinity, revealing a common binding site at an electrical distance of ~0.7 from the outside yet differential involvement of the flux‐coupling region in the external pore mouth. The smaller tetraethylammonium ion and the larger tetrahexylammonium and tetraheptylammonium ions may block the channel but could not affect desensitization. We conclude that NMDA receptor desensitization requires concomitant binding of both glycine and glutamate, and thus movement of both GluN1 and GluN2 subunits. Desensitization gate itself embodies a highly restricted pore reduction with a physical distance of ~4 Å from the charged nitrogen atom of bound tetraalkylammonium ions, and is located very close to the activation gate in the bundle‐crossing region in the external pore vestibule. The NMDA receptor channel conductance would get smaller in the continuous presence of activating ligands, a process known as desensitization. With different combinations of activating ligands and a wide range of tetraalkylammonium ions targeting mammalian NMDA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes, we show that the molecular nature of desensitization is essentially pore narrowing, with a locatio