Epidemiological and Accounting Analysis of Ground Ambulance Whole Blood Transfusion

• Published in: Prehospital and disaster medicine 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.98-103
• Main Authors: Mapp, Julian G, Bank, Eric A, Osborn, Lesley A, Stringfellow, Michael L, Reininger, David W, Winckler, Christopher J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Ambulance services; Ambulances - standards; Ambulances - statistics & numerical data; Blood Transfusion - standards; Blood Transfusion - statistics & numerical data; Blood transfusions; Disasters; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; Emergency services; Epidemiology; Etiology; Female; Fire departments; Fires; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic shock; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patients; Quality assurance; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Quality control; Retrospective Studies; Shock, Hemorrhagic - epidemiology; Shock, Hemorrhagic - therapy; Suburban areas; Texas - epidemiology; Transfusion; Trauma; Vehicles
• ISSN: 1049-023X; 1945-1938
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1900517X

In October 2017, the American Association of Blood Bankers (AABB; Bethesda, Maryland USA) approved a petition to allow low-titer group O whole blood as a standard product without the need for a waiver. Around that time, a few Texas, USA-based Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems incorporated whole blood into their ground ambulances. The purpose of this project was to describe the epidemiology of ground ambulance patients that received a prehospital whole blood transfusion. The secondary aim of this project was to report an accounting analysis of these ground ambulance prehospital whole blood programs. The dataset came from the Harris County Emergency Service District 48 Fire Department (HCESD 48; Harris County, Texas USA) and San Antonio Fire Department (SAFD; San Antonio, Texas USA) whole blood Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement (QA/QI) databases from September 2017 through December 2018. The primary outcome of this study was the prehospital transfusion indication. The secondary outcome was the projected cost per life saved during the first 10 years of the prehospital whole blood initiative. Of 58 consecutive prehospital whole blood administrations, the team included all 58 cases. Hemorrhagic shock from a non-traumatic etiology accounted for 46.5% (95% CI, 34.3%-59.2%) of prehospital whole blood recipients. In the non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock cohort, gastrointestinal hemorrhage was the underlying etiology of hemorrhagic shock in 66.7% (95% CI, 47.8%-81.4%) of prehospital whole blood transfusion recipients. The projected average cost to save a life in Year 10 was US$5,136.51 for the combined cohort, US$4,512.69 for HCESD 48, and US$5,243.72 for SAFD EMS. This retrospective analysis of ground ambulance patients that receive prehospital whole blood transfusion found that non-traumatic etiology accounted for 46.5% (95% CI, 34.3%-59.2%) of prehospital whole blood recipients. Additionally, the accounting analysis suggests that by Year 10 of a ground ambulance whole blood transfusion program, the average cost to save a life will be approximately US$5,136.51.