Patient-reported outcomes after open radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy

• Published in: Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2019-12, Vol.49 (11), p.1037-1042
• Main Authors: Hashine, Katsuyoshi, Kakuda, Toshio, Iuchi, Shunsuke, Tomida, Ryotaro, Matsumura, Masafumi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Brachytherapy - methods; Humans; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prospective Studies; Prostatectomy - adverse effects; Prostatectomy - methods; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery; Quality of Life - psychology; Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology
• ISSN: 1465-3621; 1465-3621
• DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz116

To assess patient-reported outcomes after open radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy. patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite scores at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment, respectively, using differences from baseline scores. Urinary function was the same in the three groups at baseline, but worse after surgery than after permanent prostate brachytherapy until 12 months, and similar after open radical prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy and better than after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at 36 months. Urinary bother was significantly worse at 1 month after surgery, but better after open radical prostatectomy than after permanent prostate brachytherapy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at 3 months, after which symptoms improved gradually in all groups. Obstructive/irritative symptoms were worse after permanent prostate brachytherapy than after open radical prostatectomy at 36 months, and worse after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy until 6 months. Urinary incontinence was worse after surgery, particularly after 1 month. This symptom returned to the baseline level at 12 months after open radical prostatectomy, but recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was slower. Bowel function after permanent prostate brachytherapy was significantly worse than after surgery at 1 month and this continued until 6 months. Bowel bother was slightly worse at 3 and 6 months after permanent prostate brachytherapy compared to these time points after surgery. Urinary function and bother were worst after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, especially in the early postoperative phase, whereas urinary obstructive/irritative symptom, bowel function and bother were worse after permanent prostate brachytherapy. These findings are useful and informative for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.