Endodontic considerations of survival rate for autotransplanted third molars: a nationwide population‐based study

• Published in: International endodontic journal 2020-06, Vol.53 (6), p.733-741
• Main Authors: Lin, P.‐Y., Chiang, Y.‐C., Hsu, L.‐Y., Chang, H.‐J., Chi, L.‐Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry; Endodontics; Follow-Up Studies; Molar, Third; Molars; Population studies; Population-based studies; Root Canal Therapy; Root canals; Rubber; Survival; survival analysis; Survival Rate; Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database; Teeth; tooth autotransplantation; Tooth extractions; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0143-2885; 1365-2591
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.13273

Aim To investigate whether the timing of root canal treatment (primary aim) or other endodontic parameters (secondary aim) is associated with the survival probability of autotransplanted third molars, using a nationwide population‐based database. Methodology A total of 1811 third molars autotransplanted between 2000 and 2013 met the inclusion criteria and were followed until the end of 2016. The teeth were classified into three groups on the basis of timing between root canal treatment and the autotransplantation: preoperative, extraoral and postoperative treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between the timing of root canal treatment and the risk of tooth extraction after autotransplantation. Results Of the 1811 autotransplanted third molars, 462 were extracted, yielding a 17‐year survival probability of 0.578. The survival probability of autotransplanted teeth that received postoperative root fillings after 17 years was 0.583, which was significantly higher than the 0.434 and 0.566 for teeth that received preoperative and extraoral root fillings, respectively (P = 0.0013). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, teeth that received postoperative root fillings were associated with a significantly lower tooth extraction hazard ratio (HR) compared with those that received extraoral root fillings (adjusted HR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–1.78) and those that received preoperative root fillings (adjusted HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.19–3.82). Furthermore, the use of a rubber dam during postoperative root filling was associated with a significantly lower extraction rate after autotransplantation (adjusted HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43–0.69). Conclusions Postoperative root canal treatment resulted in a significantly lower extraction rate than did preoperative or extraoral root canal treatment amongst autotransplanted third molars during a mean follow‐up period of 8.33 years. Rubber dam use is recommended during postoperative root canal treatment to improve the outcomes of autotransplantation.