Loading…
The impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on postoperative outcomes and 5-year survival in curatively operated colorectal cancer patients – A retrospective register study
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sarcopenia or myosteatosis have an impact on short- and long-term results in patients who were surgically treated for colorectal cancer. During 2007–2011 curatively treated colorectal cancer patients (n = 348) were included in the study. Clinical data wa...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1656-1662 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sarcopenia or myosteatosis have an impact on short- and long-term results in patients who were surgically treated for colorectal cancer.
During 2007–2011 curatively treated colorectal cancer patients (n = 348) were included in the study. Clinical data was collected retrospectively from patient registers. Skeletal muscle mass was measured at the L3 level via venous-phase computed tomography and patients were divided into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic and into myosteatotic and non-myosteatotic. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analysed in these groups.
Sarcopenia was found in 208 patients (59.8%) and myosteatosis was found in 108 patients (31.2%). Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.021). Sarcopenic colon cancer patients had higher rate of cardiorespiratory complications than non-sarcopenic (6.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.023) and sarcopenic rectum cancer patients had more often pneumonia than non-sarcopenic (8.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.041). Discharge to home was less common in myosteatotic patients than in non-myosteatotic patients (47.7% vs. 76.9%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.206 |