Comparative Study of Spring Ligament Reconstructions Using Either Hamstring Allograft or Synthetic Ligament Augmentation

• Published in: Foot & ankle international 2020-07, Vol.41 (7), p.803-810
• Main Authors: Heyes, Gavin, Swanton, Eric, Vosoughi, Amir Reza, Mason, Lyndon W., Molloy, Andrew P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1071-1007; 1944-7876
• DOI: 10.1177/1071100720917375

Background: Idiopathic flatfeet are usually caused by attenuation of the medial soft tissues rather than a lateral osseous deficiency. Debate continues on whether spring ligament attenuation or posterior tibial tendon (PTT) dysfunction is the initial driver for the deformity. Our comparative prospective study aimed to quantify the radiological and clinical outcomes of 2 techniques for spring ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft or a synthetic ligament. Methods: Seventeen spring ligament reconstructions (SLRs) were performed in 17 patients using synthetic ligament augmentation and 16 SLRs were performed using hamstring allograft in 13 patients. Additional procedures such as gastrocnemius recession, PTT advancement, flexor digitorum longus transfer, and calcaneal osteotomy were performed as required. A minimum of 12 months of follow-up was available for all cases. Radiographic analysis was performed with standardized parameters. Results: Following SLR with synthetic ligament augmentation, all radiological parameters significantly improved (P < .05). Hamstring allograft SLR also demonstrated significantly improved radiographic parameters in all but Meary’s line at final follow-up. At 12 months, patient outcome scores were significantly better in the synthetic ligament group. Conclusion: Reconstruction of the spring ligament using either hamstring allograft or synthetic ligament augmentation provided significant improvements in radiological alignment; however, superior patient-reported outcomes were found in the synthetic ligament augmentation group. Levels of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.