Loading…

Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations

Objectives Physician and patient/parent communication is of utmost importance in consultations to improve the shared decision‐making (SDM) processes. This study investigated SDM‐related outcomes through turn analysis and an assessment of patient‐centred dialogue. Design Multi‐centre prospective coho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical otolaryngology 2020-09, Vol.45 (5), p.725-731
Main Authors: Forner, David, Ungar, Gilanders, Chorney, Jill, Meier, Jeremy, Hong, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913
container_end_page 731
container_issue 5
container_start_page 725
container_title Clinical otolaryngology
container_volume 45
creator Forner, David
Ungar, Gilanders
Chorney, Jill
Meier, Jeremy
Hong, Paul
description Objectives Physician and patient/parent communication is of utmost importance in consultations to improve the shared decision‐making (SDM) processes. This study investigated SDM‐related outcomes through turn analysis and an assessment of patient‐centred dialogue. Design Multi‐centre prospective cohort study analysing audio‐ and video‐recorded patient/parent‐physician interactions. Setting Two tertiary paediatric hospitals in Halifax, Nova Scotia and Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants Paediatric otolaryngologists, patients and parents during consultation for adenotonsillectomy. Main outcome measures Medical dialogue measures (turn analysis, patient‐centredness scores via the Roter Interaction Analysis System) and SDM questionnaires (SDM‐Q‐9). Results Turn density was significantly higher for physicians than patients/parents (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/coa.13564
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398623224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435385265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAMuNHFtMnkMumyFG9Q6KauXIRMJlNS0klNZpDZ-Qg-o09idGoXgtmcH87HT84HwCWCYxTfRDk5RpgycgSGKCfTlBDOjg855wNwFsIGQoJhjk7BAGeYcU7RELysWl8nspa2CybEUCY72RhdN5_vHyoOr8tah5CYOi50aWTjjUpc46z0Xb121q27JLR-bZS0iXJ1aG0TG2I4ByeVtEFf7OcIPN_freaP6WL58DSfLVKFKSYpUpUuCwqVlrBgCrI8K5CGrIQ0h7wqSUXgFOWQYaYZgZqjvIKyUjBjjOZThEfgpu_deffa6tCIrQlKWytr7dogMjzlLMNZRiJ6_QfduCgg_k7ELcWcZoxG6ranlHcheF2JnTfbeK9AUHwbF9G4-DEe2at9Y1tsdXkgfxVHYNIDb8bq7v8mMV_O-sovy2yLwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435385265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Forner, David ; Ungar, Gilanders ; Chorney, Jill ; Meier, Jeremy ; Hong, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Forner, David ; Ungar, Gilanders ; Chorney, Jill ; Meier, Jeremy ; Hong, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Physician and patient/parent communication is of utmost importance in consultations to improve the shared decision‐making (SDM) processes. This study investigated SDM‐related outcomes through turn analysis and an assessment of patient‐centred dialogue. Design Multi‐centre prospective cohort study analysing audio‐ and video‐recorded patient/parent‐physician interactions. Setting Two tertiary paediatric hospitals in Halifax, Nova Scotia and Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants Paediatric otolaryngologists, patients and parents during consultation for adenotonsillectomy. Main outcome measures Medical dialogue measures (turn analysis, patient‐centredness scores via the Roter Interaction Analysis System) and SDM questionnaires (SDM‐Q‐9). Results Turn density was significantly higher for physicians than patients/parents (P &lt; .001), as were total statements (P &lt; .001), and total time talking (P &lt; .001). The opening statement was completed by the physician in 91.5% of interactions and was significantly longer than family opening statements (P = .003). The mean number of informed consent elements addressed per interaction was 4.5 out of 6. The mean patient‐centredness score was 0.2 (range 0‐0.56). Significant negative correlations between patient‐centredness score and physician turn density (r = −.390, P = .002), physician mean turn time (r = −.406, P = .001), total physician statements (r = −.426, P = .001) and total physician speaking time (r = −.313, P = .016) were noted. There were no correlations in SDM questionnaire scores with turn analysis variables, informed consent elements or patient‐centredness scores. Conclusions Surgeons dominated the consultation in terms of talking, mostly in a unidirectional manner. Neither patient‐centredness nor turn analysis correlated with perceptions of SDM from the parents' perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coa.13564</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32368851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>communication ; Correlation analysis ; Decision making ; Density ; Informed consent ; Medical personnel ; Otolaryngology ; paediatrics ; Parents ; Patients ; patient‐centred care ; Pediatrics ; Physicians ; physician‐patient relations ; Questionnaires ; shared ; tonsillectomy</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2020-09, Vol.45 (5), p.725-731</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1014-3545 ; 0000-0002-8766-3266</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Gilanders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorney, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives Physician and patient/parent communication is of utmost importance in consultations to improve the shared decision‐making (SDM) processes. This study investigated SDM‐related outcomes through turn analysis and an assessment of patient‐centred dialogue. Design Multi‐centre prospective cohort study analysing audio‐ and video‐recorded patient/parent‐physician interactions. Setting Two tertiary paediatric hospitals in Halifax, Nova Scotia and Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants Paediatric otolaryngologists, patients and parents during consultation for adenotonsillectomy. Main outcome measures Medical dialogue measures (turn analysis, patient‐centredness scores via the Roter Interaction Analysis System) and SDM questionnaires (SDM‐Q‐9). Results Turn density was significantly higher for physicians than patients/parents (P &lt; .001), as were total statements (P &lt; .001), and total time talking (P &lt; .001). The opening statement was completed by the physician in 91.5% of interactions and was significantly longer than family opening statements (P = .003). The mean number of informed consent elements addressed per interaction was 4.5 out of 6. The mean patient‐centredness score was 0.2 (range 0‐0.56). Significant negative correlations between patient‐centredness score and physician turn density (r = −.390, P = .002), physician mean turn time (r = −.406, P = .001), total physician statements (r = −.426, P = .001) and total physician speaking time (r = −.313, P = .016) were noted. There were no correlations in SDM questionnaire scores with turn analysis variables, informed consent elements or patient‐centredness scores. Conclusions Surgeons dominated the consultation in terms of talking, mostly in a unidirectional manner. Neither patient‐centredness nor turn analysis correlated with perceptions of SDM from the parents' perspective.</description><subject>communication</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>paediatrics</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>patient‐centred care</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>physician‐patient relations</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>shared</subject><subject>tonsillectomy</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAMuNHFtMnkMumyFG9Q6KauXIRMJlNS0klNZpDZ-Qg-o09idGoXgtmcH87HT84HwCWCYxTfRDk5RpgycgSGKCfTlBDOjg855wNwFsIGQoJhjk7BAGeYcU7RELysWl8nspa2CybEUCY72RhdN5_vHyoOr8tah5CYOi50aWTjjUpc46z0Xb121q27JLR-bZS0iXJ1aG0TG2I4ByeVtEFf7OcIPN_freaP6WL58DSfLVKFKSYpUpUuCwqVlrBgCrI8K5CGrIQ0h7wqSUXgFOWQYaYZgZqjvIKyUjBjjOZThEfgpu_deffa6tCIrQlKWytr7dogMjzlLMNZRiJ6_QfduCgg_k7ELcWcZoxG6ranlHcheF2JnTfbeK9AUHwbF9G4-DEe2at9Y1tsdXkgfxVHYNIDb8bq7v8mMV_O-sovy2yLwA</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Forner, David</creator><creator>Ungar, Gilanders</creator><creator>Chorney, Jill</creator><creator>Meier, Jeremy</creator><creator>Hong, Paul</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-3545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-3266</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations</title><author>Forner, David ; Ungar, Gilanders ; Chorney, Jill ; Meier, Jeremy ; Hong, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>communication</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>paediatrics</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>patient‐centred care</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>physician‐patient relations</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>shared</topic><topic>tonsillectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Gilanders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorney, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forner, David</au><au>Ungar, Gilanders</au><au>Chorney, Jill</au><au>Meier, Jeremy</au><au>Hong, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>725-731</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Objectives Physician and patient/parent communication is of utmost importance in consultations to improve the shared decision‐making (SDM) processes. This study investigated SDM‐related outcomes through turn analysis and an assessment of patient‐centred dialogue. Design Multi‐centre prospective cohort study analysing audio‐ and video‐recorded patient/parent‐physician interactions. Setting Two tertiary paediatric hospitals in Halifax, Nova Scotia and Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants Paediatric otolaryngologists, patients and parents during consultation for adenotonsillectomy. Main outcome measures Medical dialogue measures (turn analysis, patient‐centredness scores via the Roter Interaction Analysis System) and SDM questionnaires (SDM‐Q‐9). Results Turn density was significantly higher for physicians than patients/parents (P &lt; .001), as were total statements (P &lt; .001), and total time talking (P &lt; .001). The opening statement was completed by the physician in 91.5% of interactions and was significantly longer than family opening statements (P = .003). The mean number of informed consent elements addressed per interaction was 4.5 out of 6. The mean patient‐centredness score was 0.2 (range 0‐0.56). Significant negative correlations between patient‐centredness score and physician turn density (r = −.390, P = .002), physician mean turn time (r = −.406, P = .001), total physician statements (r = −.426, P = .001) and total physician speaking time (r = −.313, P = .016) were noted. There were no correlations in SDM questionnaire scores with turn analysis variables, informed consent elements or patient‐centredness scores. Conclusions Surgeons dominated the consultation in terms of talking, mostly in a unidirectional manner. Neither patient‐centredness nor turn analysis correlated with perceptions of SDM from the parents' perspective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32368851</pmid><doi>10.1111/coa.13564</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-3545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-3266</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4478
ispartof Clinical otolaryngology, 2020-09, Vol.45 (5), p.725-731
issn 1749-4478
1749-4486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398623224
source Wiley
subjects communication
Correlation analysis
Decision making
Density
Informed consent
Medical personnel
Otolaryngology
paediatrics
Parents
Patients
patient‐centred care
Pediatrics
Physicians
physician‐patient relations
Questionnaires
shared
tonsillectomy
title Turn analysis and patient‐centredness in paediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turn%20analysis%20and%20patient%E2%80%90centredness%20in%20paediatric%20otolaryngology%20surgical%20consultations&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Forner,%20David&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=725-731&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coa.13564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2435385265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-1cfedb50cea0b6c0672b1e06d05708fd4f409170636e640e817f0afc026657913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435385265&rft_id=info:pmid/32368851&rfr_iscdi=true