Loading…

Concurrent arthroscopic meniscal repair during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is not clinically beneficial for medial meniscus posterior root tears

Purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of meniscal repair during open-wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and to identify potential risk factors for meniscal healing. Methods Ninety patients with deg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021-03, Vol.29 (3), p.955-965
Main Authors: Ke, Xiurong, Qiu, Jiandi, Chen, Shanxi, Sun, Xiaoliang, Wu, Fanghui, Yang, Guojing, Zhang, Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of meniscal repair during open-wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and to identify potential risk factors for meniscal healing. Methods Ninety patients with degenerative MMPRTs were included in the final cohort and randomized into three groups. The patients in Group A ( n  = 30) underwent OWHTO and arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair concurrently, those in Group B ( n  = 34) underwent OWHTO only, and those in Group C ( n  = 26) underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded, and meniscal healing was evaluated during second-look arthroscopy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for meniscal healing. Results After a minimum follow-up of 24 months, no significant differences between Groups A and B regarding the final Lysholm ( p  = 0.689) or Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores ( p  = 0.256) were observed. There were significant differences among the three groups regarding the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) ( p  
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-020-06055-9