Loading…

Nutrition interventions in populations with mental health conditions: a scoping review

Nutrition is a modifiable factor for intervention in mental disorders. This scoping review characterized nutrition intervention research in mental disorders. A 3-category framework characterized nutrition interventions: Guide (e.g., counselling), Provide (e.g., food provisions), and Add (e.g., suppl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism nutrition, and metabolism, 2020-07, Vol.45 (7), p.687-697
Main Authors: Cherak, Stephana J, Fiest, Kirsten M, VanderSluis, Laura, Basualdo-Hammond, Carlota, Lorenzetti, Diane L, Buhler, Sue, Stadnyk, Janet, Driedger, Lorna, Hards, Lori, Gramlich, Leah, Fenton, Tanis R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nutrition is a modifiable factor for intervention in mental disorders. This scoping review characterized nutrition intervention research in mental disorders. A 3-category framework characterized nutrition interventions: Guide (e.g., counselling), Provide (e.g., food provisions), and Add (e.g., supplementation). Nutrition interventions were classified as single-component (e.g., Guide) or complex (e.g., Guide-Provide). Sixty-nine trials met inclusion criteria, 96% were randomized controlled trials. Most commonly diagnosed mental disorders were depressive disorder (i.e., persistent) or major depressive disorder ( = 39), schizophrenia ( = 17), and other psychotic disorders ( = 13). Few trials included patients with anxiety disorders ( = 2) or bipolar disorders ( = 3). Several trials ( = 15, 22%) assessed and implemented nutrition interventions to improve dietary patterns, of which 11 (73%) reported statistically significant and clinically important positive effects of nutrition interventions on mental disorders. The majority of the trials ( = 61, 90%) investigated supplementation, most commonly adding essential fatty acids, vitamins, or minerals. The majority ( = 48, 70%) reported either statistically significant or clinically important effect and 31 (51%) reported both. Though most interventions led to statistically significant improvements, trials were heterogeneous for targeted mental disorders, nutrition interventions, and outcomes assessed. Given considerable heterogeneity, further research from robust and clinically relevant trials is required to support high-quality health care with effective nutrition interventions. Future research on whole-diet interventions powered to detect changes in mental health outcomes as primary objectives is needed. Dietitians may be an opportunity to improve feasibility and efficacy of nutrition interventions for mental disorder patients. Dietitians may be of value to educate mental health practitioners on the importance of nutrition.
ISSN:1715-5312
1715-5320
DOI:10.1139/apnm-2019-0683