Loading…
Worldwide effects of non‐native species on species–area relationships
Non‐native species have invaded most parts of the world, and the invasion process is expected to continue and accelerate. Because many invading non‐native species are likely to become permanent inhabitants, future consideration of species‐area relationships (SARs) should account for non‐native speci...
Saved in:
Published in: | Conservation biology 2021-04, Vol.35 (2), p.711-721 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Non‐native species have invaded most parts of the world, and the invasion process is expected to continue and accelerate. Because many invading non‐native species are likely to become permanent inhabitants, future consideration of species‐area relationships (SARs) should account for non‐native species, either separately or jointly with native species. If non‐native species occupy unused niches and space in invaded areas and extinction rate of native species remains low (especially for plants), the resultant SARs (with both native and non‐native species) will likely be stronger. We used published and newly compiled data (35 data sets worldwide) to examine how species invasions affect SARs across selected taxonomic groups and diverse ecosystems around the world. We first examined the SARs for native, non‐native, and all species. We then investigated with linear regression analyses and paired or unpaired t tests how degree of invasion (proportion of non‐native species) affected postinvasion SARs. Postinvasion SARs for all species (native plus non‐native) became significantly stronger as degree of invasion increased (r2 = 0.31, p = 0.0006), thus, reshaping SARs worldwide. Overall, native species still showed stronger and less variable SARs. Also, slopes for native species were steeper than for non‐native species (0.298 vs. 0.153). There were some differences among non‐native taxonomic groups in filling new niches (especially for birds) and between islands and mainland ecosystems. We also found evidence that invasions may increase equilibrial diversity. Study of such changing species–area curves may help determine the probability of future invasions and have practical implications for conservation.
Efectos Globales de las Especies No Nativas sobre las Relaciones Especie‐Área
Resumen
Las especies no nativas han invadido la mayor parte del mundo y se espera que el proceso de invasión continúe y se acelere. Ya que muchas especies invasoras no nativas probablemente se conviertan en habitantes permanentes, la consideración a futuro de las relaciones especie‐área (REA) debería considerar a las especies no nativas, ya sea por separado o en conjunto con las especies nativas. Si las especies no nativas ocupan nichos sin usar y el espacio en las áreas invadidas y la tasa de extinción de las especies nativas permanecen bajas (especialmente para las plantas), las REA resultantes (tanto con las especies nativas como las no nativas) probablemente sean más fuertes. Usamos dat |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cobi.13573 |