Loading…

qMTNet: Accelerated quantitative magnetization transfer imaging with artificial neural networks

Purpose To develop a set of artificial neural networks, collectively termed qMTNet, to accelerate data acquisition and fitting for quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) imaging. Methods Conventional and interslice qMT data were acquired with two flip angles at six offset frequencies from seven s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2021-01, Vol.85 (1), p.298-308
Main Authors: Luu, Huan Minh, Kim, Dong‐Hyun, Kim, Jae‐Woong, Choi, Seung‐Hong, Park, Sung‐Hong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To develop a set of artificial neural networks, collectively termed qMTNet, to accelerate data acquisition and fitting for quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) imaging. Methods Conventional and interslice qMT data were acquired with two flip angles at six offset frequencies from seven subjects for developing the networks and from four young and four older subjects for testing the generalizability. Two subnetworks, qMTNet‐acq and qMTNet‐fit, were developed and trained to accelerate data acquisition and fitting, respectively. qMTNet‐2 is the sequential application of qMTNet‐acq and qMTNet‐fit to produce qMT parameters (exchange rate, pool fraction) from undersampled qMT data (two offset frequencies rather than six). qMTNet‐1 is one single integrated network having the same functionality as qMTNet‐2. qMTNet‐fit was compared with a Gaussian kernel‐based fitting. qMT parameters generated by the networks were compared with those from ground truth fitted with a dictionary‐driven approach. Results The proposed networks achieved high peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (>30) and structural similarity index (>97) in reference to the ground truth. qMTNet‐fit produced qMT parameters in concordance with the ground truth with better performance than the Gaussian kernel‐based fitting. qMTNet‐2 and qMTNet‐1 could accelerate data acquisition at threefold and accelerate fitting at 5800‐ and 4218‐fold, respectively. qMTNet‐1 showed slightly better performance than qMTNet‐2, whereas qMTNet‐2 was more flexible for applications. Conclusion The proposed single (qMTNet‐1) and two joint neural networks (qMTNet‐2) can accelerate qMT workflow for both data acquisition and fitting significantly. qMTNet has the potential to accelerate qMT imaging for clinical applications, which warrants further investigation.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.28411