Loading…

Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine

This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phytopathology 2020-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2003-2009
Main Authors: Wram, Catherine L, Zasada, Inga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3
container_end_page 2009
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2003
container_title Phytopathology
container_volume 110
creator Wram, Catherine L
Zasada, Inga
description This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was tested by exposing nematodes for 24 h in solution and inoculating on tomato. The average 24-h ED s (dose that resulted in the immobility of 50% of exposed nematodes) for , , and were 325.7, 223.4, and 100.7 ppm, respectively. had the most variation among populations, with 24-h ED s ranging from 72 to 788 ppm. had the lowest 24-h ED at 30 ppm. spp. were unaffected by fluazaindolizine. was the only species where effects of fluazaindolizine were reversible, but had a 24-h ED that fell in the range of the spp. In the greenhouse study, was the least sensitive with reproduction reaching 62% of the untreated control after a pre-exposure to 47 ppm, whereas and at the same exposure dose had reproduction rates of 27 and 36% of the untreated control, respectively. Despite varying in in vitro responses to fluazaindolizine, reproduction of all spp. was suppressed after only 24 h of exposure. This study expanded our understanding of how , , , and respond to fluazaindolizine.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0189-R
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426174990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2426174990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMluFDEURS0EIk2SH2CBvGSB4XmowUsUyCAFEnUSKawsl_1MG7nLlXLVovvrUyGB1Rt07l0cQt5z-MxBqy_X579urxhUTAAD3mq2fkVWXCvJmrpVr8kKQHKmlb4_IO9K-QMATVvVb8mBFLVueF2tyP5bDAFH7KdoE11jGXJfkOZAf2DK0effux7pJ3o92mmXsHebuSznWcpd9jjaZbe9p_dx2MQet5beDOgiFjplOm2Q_lx-U3TRIz1Ns93b2Puc4n6Bj8ibYFPB45d5SO5Ov9-enLPLq7OLk6-XzEmQE6tlpx1CU1tby-AAtZCVq5RDrTnqrmmEarXsoOtC5VWr2uCD0MHrVqDknTwkH597hzE_zFgms43FYUq2xzwXI5SoeaO0hgUVz6gbcykjBjOMcWvHneFgnpybv84NVEaAeXJu1kvow0v_3G3R_4_8kywfARkxfxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2426174990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Wram, Catherine L ; Zasada, Inga</creator><creatorcontrib>Wram, Catherine L ; Zasada, Inga</creatorcontrib><description>This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was tested by exposing nematodes for 24 h in solution and inoculating on tomato. The average 24-h ED s (dose that resulted in the immobility of 50% of exposed nematodes) for , , and were 325.7, 223.4, and 100.7 ppm, respectively. had the most variation among populations, with 24-h ED s ranging from 72 to 788 ppm. had the lowest 24-h ED at 30 ppm. spp. were unaffected by fluazaindolizine. was the only species where effects of fluazaindolizine were reversible, but had a 24-h ED that fell in the range of the spp. In the greenhouse study, was the least sensitive with reproduction reaching 62% of the untreated control after a pre-exposure to 47 ppm, whereas and at the same exposure dose had reproduction rates of 27 and 36% of the untreated control, respectively. Despite varying in in vitro responses to fluazaindolizine, reproduction of all spp. was suppressed after only 24 h of exposure. This study expanded our understanding of how , , , and respond to fluazaindolizine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0189-R</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32697165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology ; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring ; Plant Diseases ; Sulfonamides ; Tylenchoidea</subject><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2020-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2003-2009</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5081-2443</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wram, Catherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasada, Inga</creatorcontrib><title>Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine</title><title>Phytopathology</title><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><description>This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was tested by exposing nematodes for 24 h in solution and inoculating on tomato. The average 24-h ED s (dose that resulted in the immobility of 50% of exposed nematodes) for , , and were 325.7, 223.4, and 100.7 ppm, respectively. had the most variation among populations, with 24-h ED s ranging from 72 to 788 ppm. had the lowest 24-h ED at 30 ppm. spp. were unaffected by fluazaindolizine. was the only species where effects of fluazaindolizine were reversible, but had a 24-h ED that fell in the range of the spp. In the greenhouse study, was the least sensitive with reproduction reaching 62% of the untreated control after a pre-exposure to 47 ppm, whereas and at the same exposure dose had reproduction rates of 27 and 36% of the untreated control, respectively. Despite varying in in vitro responses to fluazaindolizine, reproduction of all spp. was suppressed after only 24 h of exposure. This study expanded our understanding of how , , , and respond to fluazaindolizine.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring</subject><subject>Plant Diseases</subject><subject>Sulfonamides</subject><subject>Tylenchoidea</subject><issn>0031-949X</issn><issn>1943-7684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMluFDEURS0EIk2SH2CBvGSB4XmowUsUyCAFEnUSKawsl_1MG7nLlXLVovvrUyGB1Rt07l0cQt5z-MxBqy_X579urxhUTAAD3mq2fkVWXCvJmrpVr8kKQHKmlb4_IO9K-QMATVvVb8mBFLVueF2tyP5bDAFH7KdoE11jGXJfkOZAf2DK0effux7pJ3o92mmXsHebuSznWcpd9jjaZbe9p_dx2MQet5beDOgiFjplOm2Q_lx-U3TRIz1Ns93b2Puc4n6Bj8ibYFPB45d5SO5Ov9-enLPLq7OLk6-XzEmQE6tlpx1CU1tby-AAtZCVq5RDrTnqrmmEarXsoOtC5VWr2uCD0MHrVqDknTwkH597hzE_zFgms43FYUq2xzwXI5SoeaO0hgUVz6gbcykjBjOMcWvHneFgnpybv84NVEaAeXJu1kvow0v_3G3R_4_8kywfARkxfxg</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Wram, Catherine L</creator><creator>Zasada, Inga</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2443</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine</title><author>Wram, Catherine L ; Zasada, Inga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring</topic><topic>Plant Diseases</topic><topic>Sulfonamides</topic><topic>Tylenchoidea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wram, Catherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasada, Inga</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wram, Catherine L</au><au>Zasada, Inga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2003</spage><epage>2009</epage><pages>2003-2009</pages><issn>0031-949X</issn><eissn>1943-7684</eissn><abstract>This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was tested by exposing nematodes for 24 h in solution and inoculating on tomato. The average 24-h ED s (dose that resulted in the immobility of 50% of exposed nematodes) for , , and were 325.7, 223.4, and 100.7 ppm, respectively. had the most variation among populations, with 24-h ED s ranging from 72 to 788 ppm. had the lowest 24-h ED at 30 ppm. spp. were unaffected by fluazaindolizine. was the only species where effects of fluazaindolizine were reversible, but had a 24-h ED that fell in the range of the spp. In the greenhouse study, was the least sensitive with reproduction reaching 62% of the untreated control after a pre-exposure to 47 ppm, whereas and at the same exposure dose had reproduction rates of 27 and 36% of the untreated control, respectively. Despite varying in in vitro responses to fluazaindolizine, reproduction of all spp. was suppressed after only 24 h of exposure. This study expanded our understanding of how , , , and respond to fluazaindolizine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32697165</pmid><doi>10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0189-R</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2443</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-949X
ispartof Phytopathology, 2020-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2003-2009
issn 0031-949X
1943-7684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426174990
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects Animals
Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology
Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring
Plant Diseases
Sulfonamides
Tylenchoidea
title Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20Response%20of%20Meloidogyne%20,%20Pratylenchus%20,%20Globodera%20,%20and%20Xiphinema%20Species%20to%20the%20Nematicide%20Fluazaindolizine&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Wram,%20Catherine%20L&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2003&rft.epage=2009&rft.pages=2003-2009&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.eissn=1943-7684&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0189-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2426174990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-63b9ce076aa63fc0e9235c54ce991e9b7724893b0bbf5d4848fdf29fd982e31b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2426174990&rft_id=info:pmid/32697165&rfr_iscdi=true