Clinical Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for the Treatment of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis in the Last Decade: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2020-09, Vol.59 (5), p.1032-1039
• Main Authors: Shih, Chia-Lung, Chen, Shu-Jung, Huang, Peng-Ju
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ankle arthrodesis; end-stage ankle arthritis; third-generation implant; total ankle arthroplasty
• ISSN: 1067-2516; 1542-2224
• DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.008

Ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are the 2 primary surgical treatments for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. The comparative outcomes between AA and TAA using modern techniques remain unclear. A systematic search to identify all relevant articles comparing AA with TAA was conducted through 3 online databases. The clinical outcomes were extracted for meta-analysis, including AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) score, VAS (visual analog scale), AOS (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale), gait analysis, ROM (range of motion), satisfaction, complication, and reoperation. Our meta-analysis shows no heterogeneity in any subgroup analyses. There were no significant differences in AOFAS total, pain, and alignment scores between the AA and TAA groups. The TAA group had significant improvement in AOFAS function score compared with the AA group. There was no significant difference in VAS and AOS total scores between the 2 groups. No significant differences in gait analysis were observed between the 2 groups. The TAA group had significant improvement in both ROM and change in ROM compared with the AA group. There was no significant difference in satisfaction rate between the 2 groups. The TAA group had significantly higher complication and reoperation rates compared with the AA group. Our meta-analysis provides updated evidence on clinical outcomes comparing AA with TAA using third-generation implants. The TAA group had better improvement in AOFAS function and ROM than the AA group. No significant differences in pain relief, gait analysis, or patient satisfaction were observed between the 2 groups.