Loading…

Uncertainty Estimations for Collision Cross Section Determination via Uniform Field Drift Tube-Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Uniform field drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometry (DTIM-MS) has emerged as a valuable tool for a range of analytical applications. In focus here are standardized collisional cross section values from DTIM-MS (DTCCS) as a candidate identification point for various analytical workflows. Of criti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2020-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2102-2110
Main Authors: Causon, Tim J, Hann, Stephan
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Uniform field drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometry (DTIM-MS) has emerged as a valuable tool for a range of analytical applications. In focus here are standardized collisional cross section values from DTIM-MS (DTCCS) as a candidate identification point for various analytical workflows. Of critical importance in establishing this parameter as a valid identification point is a rugged estimation of uncertainties according to the procedures used for their derivation. Relying on the assumption of the zero-field limit, the primary method of measurement for DTCCS values involves experimental determination of arrival times of an ion measured at several different field strengths transiting a drift tube filled with high purity drift gas, while a method using measurements of external calibrants at a single field strength is employed to allow for online measurements of transient signals (e.g., chromatographic peaks). Both approaches are here considered with respect to the uncertainty of input experimental variables (temperature, pressure, voltages, physical constants) and the steps of the calibration function employed. Estimations of uncertainty were performed according to EURACHEM with Monte Carlo simulations and reveal that existing consensus calibration standards from experimental stepped-field IM-MS determinations have estimated expanded uncertainties in the range of 2.7 to 4.6% (k = 2). Application of these standards for calibration considering these input uncertainties reveals uncertainty estimates of 4.7–9.1% (k = 2) for measured values using an established single-field calibration approach. Finally, directions for improving this situation via new experimental efforts toward standard reference and calibration materials are presented.
ISSN:1044-0305
1879-1123
DOI:10.1021/jasms.0c00233