Family Survey of Understanding and Communication of Patient Prognosis in the Intensive Care Unit: Identifying Training Opportunities

• Published in: Journal of surgical education 2020-11, Vol.77 (6), p.e154-e163
• Main Authors: Newcomb, Anna, Liu, Chang, Smith, Grace, Lita, Elena, Griffen, Margaret M., Mohess, Denise, Grove, Charles, Dort, Jonathan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Communication; Family experience; ICU; Prognosis; Survey research
• ISSN: 1931-7204; 1878-7452
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.009

•We compared ICU family, surgeon, and nurse assessment of the patient's condition.•Surgeon-family agreement on condition, chance of cure, goals of treatment was low.•Family satisfaction with patient care, information access, support, was high.•Families relay most on nurses for information about the patient.•Mentors should be trained to teach complex information sharing with families in crisis. Family members making medical decisions for critically ill patients depend on surgeons’ high-quality communication. We aimed to assess family experience of communication in the trauma intensive care unit (TICU), identify opportunities for improvement, and tailor resident communication training to address deficiencies. We designed surveys based on our Conceptual Model of Surgeon Communication and Family Understanding, using items from previously validated tools to assess (1) family well-being, experiences of care, access to information, and assessment of patient condition and prognosis; and (2) surgeon and nursing assessment of patient condition and prognosis. Level I TICU in an independent academic medical center. Adult family members of patients hospitalized in the TICU > 24 hours; 88 families, 22 residents, 9 attendings, 81 nurses completed surveys on 78 unique patients. Family indicated: (1) they had easy access to medical information (91%); (2) the doctors (89%) and nurses (99%) listened carefully (p = 0.013); (3) they were included in morning rounds (80%); and (4) the doctors (91%) and nurses (98%) explained things well (p = 0.041). Family-surgeon agreement regarding the patient's condition and chance of cure was poor (28%) and fair (58%) respectively; families were typically more pessimistic than the surgeon regarding the patient's condition (65%), and more optimistic regarding chance of cure (26%). Residents cited mentors and skills practice with simulated patients as most influential training elements on communication style. Although families reported high-quality communication with the surgical team and rated physicians well in attributes related to trust, significant discordance in surgeon-family understanding of the patient's condition and prognosis persisted. This may be related to physician difficulty communicating complex information, or a family member's distress resulting in cognitive compromise, coupled with coping through hope and optimism. We recommend ongoing communication training for residents, skills practice for mentors, and open communication