Loading…

Association of dietary acid load with serum bicarbonate in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients

Background/objectives Diet can affect the acid–base status depending on the balance between the intake of acid-inducing foods and base-inducing foods. The purpose of this study was to estimate the dietary acid load and evaluate its association with serum bicarbonate in patients with stages 3 and 4 c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical nutrition 2020-08, Vol.74 (Suppl 1), p.69-75
Main Authors: Angeloco, Larissa Rodrigues Neto, Arces de Souza, Gabriela Cristina, Romão, Elen Almeida, Frassetto, Lynda, Chiarello, Paula Garcia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background/objectives Diet can affect the acid–base status depending on the balance between the intake of acid-inducing foods and base-inducing foods. The purpose of this study was to estimate the dietary acid load and evaluate its association with serum bicarbonate in patients with stages 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease. Subjects/methods One hundred adults (aged ≥ 20 years) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 and 4 were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. A food diary was used to estimate the animal and plant protein intakes, which were used in the potential renal acid load (PRAL) formula described by Remer and Manz. PRAL was divided into quartiles. Regression models unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, creatinine clearance were performed using the stepwise regression method. Results The median level (25th, 75th percentiles) of PRAL was 8.3 mEq/day (1.6, 15.6). The highest quartile of PRAL had a higher consumption of animal protein (77.8 ± 10.9%) and a reduced consumption of plant protein (22.2 ± 10.9%), compared to the lowest quartile (59.5 ± 18.6% animal protein, 40.5 ± 18.6% plant protein), p for trend
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/s41430-020-0689-1