Loading…

Does (mis)use of industrial liquid silicone implants interfere with bone mineral density in transgender women?

Summary The effects of gluteal implants on bone mass remain unclear. Transgender women with ILS presented higher BMD in the hip compared with transgender women without implants, while no difference was observed in other sites. These results may be artifactual and suggest using spine/forearm sites fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of osteoporosis 2020-12, Vol.15 (1), p.149-149, Article 149
Main Authors: Fighera, Tayane Muniz, da Silva, Eliane Dias, Borba, Gustavo da Silva, Spritzer, Poli Mara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary The effects of gluteal implants on bone mass remain unclear. Transgender women with ILS presented higher BMD in the hip compared with transgender women without implants, while no difference was observed in other sites. These results may be artifactual and suggest using spine/forearm sites for DXA in individuals with ILS. Purpose The inappropriate use of industrial liquid silicone (ILS) injections for cosmetic purposes is practiced by some transgender women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gluteal ILS on femur BMD in transgender women. Methods A total of 46 trans women with and without ILS injection in the gluteal region were selected. All patients underwent clinical and hormonal evaluation, and bone mass was assessed by DXA. Results Bone mineral density (BMD) values were significantly higher in trans women with ILS ( n = 23) in femoral neck and total femur when compared with trans women without implants ( n = 23). Similar BMD was observed in other sites, such as lumbar spine and forearm. Good agreement was found in the evaluation of low BMD using spine/forearm or spine/femur in patients without implants ( k = 0.744 and 1.000 for male and female reference database, respectively), but poor to fair index was found in patients with ILS implants ( k = 0.330 and 0.646 for male and female reference database, respectively). Conclusions In transgender women with ILS implants, poor to moderate agreement was found on BMD when comparing lumbar spine/femur DXA with an alternative site to the femur, depending on using male or female database. These results may be artifactual and suggest using spine/forearm sites for more accurate DXA assessments in trans women with ILS gluteal implants.
ISSN:1862-3522
1862-3514
DOI:10.1007/s11657-020-00824-2