Loading…

Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report

INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of surgery case reports 2020, Vol.77S, p.S143-S146
Main Authors: Cucinella, Gaspare, Culmone, Silvia, Guastella, Ettore, Gentile, Francesco, De Maria, Francesca, GranĂ , Roberto, Carlisi, Bruno, Rotolo, Stefano, Calagna, Gloria
Format: Report
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension. DISCUSSIONData suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONWe found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.
ISSN:2210-2612
2210-2612
DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055