Clinical Benefits of Preconditioning Intervention in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Kanto Study of Group for Cell Therapy Multicenter Analysis

• Published in: Transplantation and cellular therapy 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70.e1-70.e8
• Main Authors: Tachibana, Takayoshi, Kanda, Junya, Ishizaki, Takuma, Najima, Yuho, Tanaka, Masatsugu, Doki, Noriko, Fujiwara, Shin-ichiro, Kimura, Shun-ichi, Onizuka, Makoto, Takahashi, Satoshi, Saito, Takeshi, Mori, Takehiko, Fujisawa, Shin, Sakaida, Emiko, Miyazaki, Takuya, Aotsuka, Nobuyuki, Gotoh, Moritaka, Watanabe, Reiko, Shono, Katsuhiro, Usuki, Kensuke, Tsukada, Nobuhiro, Kanamori, Heiwa, Kanda, Yoshinobu, Okamoto, Shinichiro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute leukemia; Preconditioning intervention; Refractory; Relapse
• ISSN: 2666-6367; 2666-6367
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.025

•The clinical significance of preconditioning intervention (PCI) for relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia was evaluated.•No PCI and good PCI were related to low blast control.•In PCI, good PCI, regardless of intensity, may be beneficial for improving outcomes A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of preconditioning intervention (PCI) before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) not in remission. The study cohort consisted of 519 patients classified according to the intensity (intensive/moderate) of PCI and their response to PCI. The group treated with PCI had higher blast counts in the peripheral blood (PB) and had a lower overall survival (OS) rate (P < .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate (P = .035) compared with those without PCI (no PCI group). Approximately 40% of the patients (68 of 236) achieved a good response to PCI (good PCI group), and those patients had lower blast counts in the PB compared with the group with poor response to PCI (poor PCI group). OS in the good PCI group was comparable to that in the no PCI group and significantly better than that in the poor PCI group (hazard ratio, .54; 95% confidence interval, .39 to .77; P < .001). However, OS was significantly lower in patients with intensive/moderate PCI compared with the no PCI group. These results suggest that PCI increases NRM without decreasing the post-transplantation relapse rate, but may be beneficial for patients with lower blast counts in PB irrespective of its intensity.