Understanding Covalent versus Spin–Orbit Coupling Contributions to Temperature-Dependent Electron Spin Relaxation in Cupric and Vanadyl Phthalocyanines

• Published in: The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 2020-11, Vol.124 (44), p.9252-9260
• Main Authors: Follmer, Alec H, Ribson, Ryan D, Oyala, Paul H, Chen, Grace Y, Hadt, Ryan G
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: A: Spectroscopy, Molecular Structure, and Quantum Chemistry
• ISSN: 1089-5639; 1520-5215
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c07860

Recent interest in transition-metal complexes as potential quantum bits (qubits) has reinvigorated the investigation of fundamental contributions to electron spin relaxation in various ligand scaffolds. From quantum computers to chemical and biological sensors, interest in leveraging the quantum properties of these molecules has opened a discussion of the requirements to maintain coherence over a large temperature range, including near room temperature. Here we compare temperature-, magnetic field position-, and concentration-dependent electron spin relaxation in copper­(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc) and vanadyl phthalocyanine (VOPc) doped into diamagnetic hosts. While VOPc demonstrates coherence up to room temperature, CuPc coherence times become rapidly T 1-limited with increasing temperature, despite featuring a more covalent ground-state wave function than VOPc. As rationalized by a ligand field model, this difference is ascribed to different spin–orbit coupling (SOC) constants for Cu­(II) versus V­(IV). The manifestation of SOC contributions to spin–phonon coupling and electron spin relaxation in different ligand fields is discussed, allowing for a further understanding of the competing roles of SOC and covalency in electron spin relaxation.