Loading…

Can distraction-based surgeries achieve minimum 18 cm thoracic height for patients with early onset scoliosis?

Purpose Karol et al. introduced the concept that 18 cm thoracic height is the critical point where a patient with early onset scoliosis (EOS) can maintain adequate pulmonary function. Our purpose was to determine if distraction-based surgeries will increase thoracic spine height to at least 18 cm in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine deformity 2021-03, Vol.9 (2), p.603-608
Main Authors: ElBromboly, Yehia, Hurry, Jennifer, Johnston, Charles, McClung, Anna, Samdani, Amer, Glotzbecker, Michael, Hilaire, Tricia St, Flynn, Tara, El-Hawary, Ron
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Karol et al. introduced the concept that 18 cm thoracic height is the critical point where a patient with early onset scoliosis (EOS) can maintain adequate pulmonary function. Our purpose was to determine if distraction-based surgeries will increase thoracic spine height to at least 18 cm in patients with EOS. Methods Patients with EOS treated with distraction-based systems (minimum 5 years follow up, minimum five lengthenings). Radiographic analysis of thoracic spine height (T1–T12) at the last lengthening procedure. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients (67 congenital, 21 neuromuscular, 38 syndromic, 27 idiopathic) with pre-operative mean age 4.6 years, scoliosis 75°, kyphosis 47° were evaluated. Their mean age at final lengthening procedure was 11 years (6–16), average number of lengthening procedures was 10.5 (4–21), mean final scoliosis was 53°, and mean final kyphosis was 58°. Final thoracic height was > 18 cm in 65% and was > 22 cm in 31% of patients. Based on etiology, only 48% of the congenital patients reached 18 cm compared to 81% neuromuscular, 84% syndromic and 67% idiopathic. This height gain was closely related to the percentage of scoliosis correction achieved for each etiology. Comparing congenital etiology to other etiologies, there was a lower percentage of patients in the congenital group that passed the 18 cm threshold (48% vs. 78%) ( p  
ISSN:2212-134X
2212-1358
DOI:10.1007/s43390-020-00230-1