Going against patients’ will? A qualitative study of how palliative health-care professionals handle competing considerations when children are excluded from parental illness and death

• Published in: European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 2020-12, Vol.49, p.101839-101839, Article 101839
• Main Authors: Hogstad, Ingrid Johnsen, Leer-Salvesen, Kjartan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Attitude to Death; Child; Child, Preschool; Children as next of kin; Children as relatives; Confidentiality; Confidentiality - ethics; Confidentiality - psychology; Decision-making; Family - psychology; Female; Health Personnel - psychology; Health professionals; Hermeneutics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Moral problem; Norway; Nursing; Palliative care; Palliative Care - psychology; Parents - psychology; Patient autonomy; Patient Preference - psychology; Professional-Family Relations; Professional-Patient Relations; Qualitative Research; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1462-3889; 1532-2122
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101839

The Norwegian Health Personnel Act (HPA §10a) obliges health professionals to contribute to meeting minor children's need for information about their parents' illness and prognosis. Previous research has shown that many parents withhold information about illness and anticipated death from their children. This study explored main considerations for palliative health-care professionals in these situations, and how they negotiate conflicting considerations of confidentiality and child involvement. This qualitative exploratory study involved semi-structured interviews with 11 palliative health-care professionals. Hermeneutics informed the data analysis. The health professionals' main considerations were sustaining patients' hope and building trust in the professional–patient relationship. Both concerns were grounded in respect for patient autonomy. The health professionals negotiated patient autonomy and child involvement in different ways, defined in the present analysis on a continuum ranging from granting full patient autonomy to going directly against patients’ will. The professional–patient relationship is the primary consideration in the health care context, and decision making on the degree of children's involvement happens in a dialogical process between health professionals and patients. Close professional–patient relationships might increase the emotional impacts on health professionals, who consequently might give greater relative weight to patients' will. We propose that procedures for initiating collaboration with professionals in the child's everyday life context help health professionals involving the child without threatening trust. •Some patients do not want to communicate their imminent death to their minor child.•Bound by confidentiality, health professionals encounter a moral problem.•Health professionals and the health care system prioritise the patient.•In this study patient autonomy trump children's involvement.•Relations where the child has priority are pivotal to securing children's right.