The effect of motor engagement on memory: Testing a motor-induced encoding account

• Published in: Memory & cognition 2021-04, Vol.49 (3), p.586-599
• Main Authors: Kinder, Kaleb T., Buss, Aaron T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Psychology; Executive function; Experiments; Humans; Inhibition, Psychological; Memory; Nervous system; Psychology; Recognition, Psychology
• ISSN: 0090-502X; 1532-5946; 1532-5946
• DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01113-6

The motor system is traditionally thought to reflect the output of cognition. However, the inverse relationship of how the motor system impacts cognitive processes is less known. Work on this interaction has demonstrated that recognition memory for stimuli presented in combination with the inhibition of a prepared action is weaker compared to stimuli associated with the execution of an action (Chiu & Egner, Psychological Science , 26, 27-38, 2015a ). This effect has been explained through competition for common neural resources: to the extent that response inhibition processes are recruited, fewer resources are available for memory encoding (Chiu & Egner, Journal of Neuroscience , 35, 11936-11945, 2015b ). Alternatively, it has been proposed that action execution enhances memory encoding (Yebra et al., Nature Communications , 10 (1), 1-12, 2019 ). In this report, we examined how recognition memory for stimuli paired with both the preparation and execution of a motor response compare to stimuli absent of any motor processes. We first replicated Chiu and Egner ( 2015a , 2015b ). Next, we added a motor-neutral condition as a baseline comparison. Across three experiments, recognition memory for stimuli associated with action execution was superior to stimuli absent of motor demands. More importantly, we found that recognition memory for stimuli associated with motor preparation, but no subsequent execution, was also superior to stimuli that did not engage the motor system (Experiments 2 a and 2 b). These results support a motor-induced encoding effect, in which the degree of motor processing (both action preparation and action execution) enhanced memory encoding.