Loading…
Predicting the clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear: malposition and tear of the long head of the biceps tendon on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging
Background The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is low for detecting a subscapularis tendon tear. Purpose To identify MRI findings that may predict the presence of a clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear requiring surgical repair. Material and Methods We reviewed sh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta radiologica (1987) 2021-12, Vol.62 (12), p.1648-1656 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is low for detecting a subscapularis tendon tear.
Purpose
To identify MRI findings that may predict the presence of a clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear requiring surgical repair.
Material and Methods
We reviewed shoulder MR images of patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our institution between June 2018 and May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: the study group (n = 51), with an intermediate- to high-grade partial thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon suspected on preoperative MRI and intermediate or higher grade of the tendon tear proven on arthroscopy; and the control group (n = 18), with an intermediate- to high-grade partial thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon suspected on preoperative MRI but no tear or low-grade partial thickness tear of the tendon shown on arthroscopy. Preoperative MR images were retrospectively evaluated by two readers for the size of the subscapularis tendon tear, bone reactions at the lesser tuberosity, and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology.
Results
The subscapularis tendon tear measured by reader 2 was larger in the study group than in the control group. The prevalence of a tear (P = 0.006 for reader 1; P = 0.011 for reader 2) and malposition (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0284-1851 1600-0455 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0284185120980017 |