Detection of an Autism EEG Signature From Only Two EEG Channels Through Features Extraction and Advanced Machine Learning Analysis

• Published in: Clinical EEG and neuroscience 2021-07, Vol.52 (5), p.330-337
• Main Authors: Grossi, Enzo, Valbusa, Giovanni, Buscema, Massimo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Autism; Children; EEG; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; Mental disorders; Neonates; Neural networks
• ISSN: 1550-0594; 2169-5202
• DOI: 10.1177/1550059420982424

Background and Objective In 2 previous studies, we have shown the ability of special machine learning systems applied to standard EEG data in distinguishing children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from non-ASD children with an overall accuracy rate of 100% and 98.4%, respectively. Since the equipment routinely available in neonatology units employ few derivations, we were curious to check if just 2 derivations were enough to allow good performance in the same cases of the above-mentioned studies. Methods A continuous segment of artifact-free EEG data lasting 1 minute in ASCCI format from C3 and C4 EEG channels present in 2 previous studies, was used for features extraction and subsequent analyses with advanced machine learning systems. A features extraction software package (Python tsfresh) applied to time-series raw data derived 1588 quantitative features. A special hybrid system called TWIST (Training with Input Selection and Testing), coupling an evolutionary algorithm named Gen-D and a backpropagation neural network, was used to subdivide the data set into training and testing sets as well as to select features yielding the maximum amount of information after a first variable selection performed with linear correlation index threshold. Results After this intelligent preprocessing, 12 features were extracted from C3-C4 time-series of study 1 and 36 C3-C4 time-series of study 2 representing the EEG signature. Acting on these features the overall accuracy predictive capability of the best artificial neural network acting as a classifier in deciphering autistic cases from typicals (study 1) and other neuropsychiatric disorders (study 2) resulted in 100 % for study 1 and 94.95 % for study 2. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that also a minor part of EEG contains precious information useful to detect autism if treated with advanced computational algorithms. This could allow in the future to use standard EEG from newborns to check if the ASD signature is already present at birth.