Investigating neural circuits of emotion regulation to distinguish euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

• Published in: Bipolar disorders 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.284-294
• Main Authors: Rai, Sabina, Griffiths, Kristi, Breukelaar, Isabella A., Barreiros, Ana R., Chen, Wenting, Boyce, Philip, Hazell, Philip, Foster, Sheryl, Malhi, Gin S., Bryant, Richard A, Harris, Anthony W.F., Korgaonkar, Mayuresh S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amygdala; Bipolar disorder; Brain mapping; Cognitive ability; emotion regulation; Emotions; fMRI; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Information processing; Lability; Mental depression; Mood; mood disorders; Neural networks; reappraisal; subgenual anterior cingulate cortex
• ISSN: 1398-5647; 1399-5618
• DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13042

Background Up to 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially diagnosed as having major depressive disorder (MDD), and emotional lability is a key aspect of both sets of mood disorders. However, it remains unknown whether differences in the regulation of emotions through cognitive reappraisal may serve to distinguish BD and MDD. Therefore, we examined this question in euthymic BD and MDD patients. Methods Thirty‐eight euthymic BD, 33 euthymic MDD and 37 healthy control (HC) participants, matched for age, gender and depression severity, engaged in an emotion regulation (ER) cognitive reappraisal task during an fMRI scan were examined. Participants either reappraised (Think condition) or passively watched negative (Watch condition) or neutral (Neutral condition) pictures and rated their affect. Activation and connectivity analyses were used to examine group differences in reappraisal (Think vs Watch) and reactivity (Watch vs Neutral) conditions in ER‐specific neural circuits. Results Irrespective of group, participants rated most negatively the images during the Watch condition relative to Think and Neutral conditions, and more negatively to Think relative to Neutral. Notably, BD participants exhibited reduced subgenual anterior cingulate activation (sgACC) relative to MDD during reappraisal, but exhibited greater sgACC activation relative to MDD during reactivity, whereas MDD participants elicited greater activation in right amygdala relative to BD during reactivity. We found no group differences in task‐related connectivity. Conclusions Euthymic BD and MDD patients engage differential brain regions to process and regulate emotional information. These differences could serve to distinguish the clinical groups and provide novel insights into the underlying pathophysiology of BD.