Loading…

Body mass index as an independent prognostic factor in glioblastoma

Purpose Glioblastoma prognosis remains dismal despite gross total removal (GTR) followed by chemoradiotherapy. Other known prognostic factors include functional status, age and IDH mutation status. However, to improve patient outcome, a search for other features with impact on survival is needed. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer causes & control 2021-04, Vol.32 (4), p.327-336
Main Authors: Valente Aguiar, Pedro, Carvalho, Bruno, Vaz, Rui, Linhares, Paulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Glioblastoma prognosis remains dismal despite gross total removal (GTR) followed by chemoradiotherapy. Other known prognostic factors include functional status, age and IDH mutation status. However, to improve patient outcome, a search for other features with impact on survival is needed. We aimed to analyse the impact of body mass index (BMI) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of surgically resected primary glioblastoma and evaluate if BMI constitutes an independent prognostic factor. Methods We analysed all adult glioblastoma patients who underwent surgery and chemoradiotherapy between 2011 and 2017 at our institution. Overall survival was the study—primary endpoint, and progression-free survival—the secondary endpoint. We assayed age, gender, histology, extent of resection, IDH, functional and smoking status, cardiovascular risk factors, BMI, OS and PFS. Univariate analysis was conducted followed by multivariate analysis to establish independent prognostic factors. In accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) BMI stratification, survival curves were obtained for normal-weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m 2 ) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) patient subgroups in addition to the non-obese (18.5–29.9 kg/m 2 ) population. Results 193 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up time of 17.3 months. Median OS was 21.3 months in obese patients vs 16.2 months in the non-obese ( p  = 0.017) and 16 months in the normal weight ( p  = 0.007). Higher median OS was also observed in patients under 60 and those in which GTR was obtained. Median PFS in obese individuals was 9 months in comparison to 6 months in the normal-weight subgroup ( p  = 0.04) and 7 months in the non-obese ( p  = 0.050). Multivariate analysis identified age 
ISSN:0957-5243
1573-7225
DOI:10.1007/s10552-020-01388-9