A longitudinal histologic evaluation of vitamin D receptor expression in the skeletal muscles of patients with a distal radius fracture

• Published in: Osteoporosis international 2021-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1387-1393
• Main Authors: Shim, B. J., Lee, M. H., Lim, J. Y., Gong, H. S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Calcifediol; Endocrinology; Female; Forearm; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Original Article; Orthopedics; Radius Fractures; Receptors, Calcitriol - genetics; Rheumatology; Skeletal muscle; Supplements; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency - drug therapy; Vitamin D receptors
• ISSN: 0937-941X; 1433-2965
• DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05809-y

Summary We investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the expression of muscle vitamin D receptor (VDR) and cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients with a distal radius fracture (DRF). Significant increases in VDR expression and CSA were observed, especially in vitamin D-deficient patients. Purpose Vitamin D supplementation is known to enhance muscle mass and function, but whether the VDR is essential in this process remains unknown. We evaluated the change in VDR expression and CSA in the forearm muscles following vitamin D supplementation in patients with a DRF. Methods We prospectively recruited 18 women with a median age of 63.5 years who have a DRF. We obtained two biopsies of the forearm muscle, first at the time of fracture repair and then during hardware removal. We supplemented 1000 IU of vitamin D per day during a median interval of 8 months. We examined the changes in VDR expression and CSA by immunohistochemistry. Results The median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] increased from 14.3 to 32.1 ng/mL ( P = 0.001). The median VDR expression increased from 0.72 to 0.78 ( P = 0.002), and the median CSA increased from 1290.0 to 1685.8 μm 2 ( P = 0.022). Significant increases in VDR expression and CSA were observed in vitamin D-deficient patients [25(OH)D] < 20 ng/mL, but not in vitamin D-non-deficient patients. The changes in VDR expression and CSA were in the same direction in 13 patients, but in the opposite direction in 5 patients. Conclusion Vitamin D supplementation may increase muscle VDR expression and CSA in patients with a DRF, especially in vitamin D-deficient patients. The increase in CSA without an increase in VDR expression in some patients indicates that the effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle mass could be mediated by indirect effect of serum vitamin D restoration and by VDR.