Loading…

Triaging abnormal cervical cancer screening tests using p16INK4a detection by ELISA on fresh cervical samples

Problem Cervical cancer screening strategies in the United States include cotesting (human papillomavirus (HPV) with cytology), primary HPV with genotyping and reflex cytology, and cytology alone. An ongoing challenge is the appropriate triage of patients to colposcopy to those at highest risk. We i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of reproductive immunology (1989) 2021-07, Vol.86 (1), p.e13394-n/a
Main Authors: Leung, Shuk On Annie, Feldman, Sarah, Kalyanaraman, Rajeshwari, Shanmugam, Vignesh, Worley, Michael J., Berkowitz, Ross S., Horowitz, Neil S., Feltmate, Colleen M., Muto, Michael G., Lee, Larissa J., King, Martin T., Einarsson, Jon I., Ajao, Mobolaji O., Elias, Kevin M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Problem Cervical cancer screening strategies in the United States include cotesting (human papillomavirus (HPV) with cytology), primary HPV with genotyping and reflex cytology, and cytology alone. An ongoing challenge is the appropriate triage of patients to colposcopy to those at highest risk. We investigated whether incorporation of p16INK4a immunodetection by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on fresh cervical samples obtained at the time of screening could improve appropriate referral to colposcopy. Method of Study A derivation group comprised of cervical swabs collected from subjects with high‐grade dysplasia or cancer (positive control) and from subjects with negative screening history (negative control). Samples collected from colposcopy were used to evaluate the existing screening strategies individually and with incorporation of p16INK4a ELISA. Histology was used as the gold standard. Results Among 163 subjects recruited, 138 were included. In the derivation group, mean p16INK4a level was 2.86 ng/mL (n = 31) and 0.58 ng/mL (n = 20) among positive and negative controls respectively (p = 0.002) with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.79 (p 
ISSN:1046-7408
1600-0897
DOI:10.1111/aji.13394