Loading…
Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident
Background Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American surgeon 2022-06, Vol.88 (6), p.1181-1186 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described.
Methods
For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication.
Results
A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/− 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident’s sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls.
Conclusions
Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0003134821991987 |